Literature DB >> 1707187

Anterior and combined anteroposterior fusion for lumbar disc pain. A preliminary study.

M A Linson1, H Williams.   

Abstract

This article reports on a study of 51 consecutive patients (83 lumbar discs) with back pain who underwent anterior interbody lumbar fusion or combined anterior and posterior fusion at the same operation during a 2-year period. All patients met the criteria for diagnosis of a painful internal disc disruption and/or failed back syndrome and have had a lengthy trial of conservative treatment consisting of rest, physical therapy, back support, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy, and guarded activity; this treatment was often supplemented by epidural cortisone injections, pain management, and functional rehabilitation. Patients with prolonged back pain who failed with conservative care after a minimum of 12 months of severely disabling symptoms were selected for surgery on the basis of a positive dynamic discogram reproducing their exact pain and demonstrating a morphologically degenerative disc (internal disc disruption). For the purpose of this study, patients were categorized into three groups and followed up for 15-36 months after the operation. There were no deaths or major complications, and the overall success in achieving measurable diminution of preoperative pain was 80%. This article discusses preliminary conclusions on the efficacy and safety on anterior and anteroposterior fusion for lumbar disc pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1707187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Discography: A Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

2.  Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  V Saraph; C Lerch; N Walochnik; C M Bach; M Krismer; C Wimmer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann; Volker Vieth; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Vertebral body MRI related to lumbar fusion results.

Authors:  G R Buttermann; K B Heithoff; J W Ogilvie; E E Transfeldt; M Cohen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Dynamics of an intervertebral disc prosthesis in human cadaveric spines.

Authors:  Kathleen N Meyers; Deirdre A Campbell; Joseph D Lipman; Kai Zhang; Elizabeth R Myers; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

6.  A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2-year clinical results.

Authors:  Patrick J McKenna; Brian J C Freeman; Robert C Mulholland; Michael P Grevitt; John K Webb; S H Mehdian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view.

Authors:  N Boos; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparative Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in TLIF for Lumbar Degenerative Disorder: Single Center Large Series.

Authors:  Vigneshwara Badikillaya; Keyur K Akbari; Pramod Sudarshan; Hardik Suthar; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Sajan K Hegde
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

9.  Combined anterior interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease.

Authors:  M A El Masry; W S Badawy; P Rajendran; D Chan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.