Literature DB >> 17070360

Prostate cancer in Korean men exhibits poor differentiation and is adversely related to prognosis after radical prostatectomy.

Cheryn Song1, Jae Y Ro, Moo-Song Lee, Sung-Joon Hong, Byung-Ha Chung, Han Yong Choi, Sang-Eun Lee, Eunsik Lee, Choung-Soo Kim, Hanjong Ahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of prostate cancer in Korean men to determine how ethnic differences affect clinical outcome.
METHODS: The clinical and pathologic data of 604 Korean men who underwent radical prostatectomy from 1994 to 2003 were reviewed. Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 0.2 ng/mL or greater on two consecutive occasions after having achieved an undetectable PSA level. Patient distribution with respect to the clinical and pathologic parameters and biochemical failure rates were compared with those of contemporary Western series.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative PSA level was 9.9 ng/mL (range 0.4 to 38.8) and the median biopsy Gleason score was 7. The Gleason score was 7 in 186 patients (30.8%) and greater than 7 in 169 (28.0%). Gleason scores stratified with respect to clinical stage and PSA range revealed the proportion of patients with high Gleason scores (7 or greater) to be more than 50% of each subgroup throughout the clinical stages and PSA ranges. At a median follow-up of 57.9 months (range 22 to 131), biochemical failure occurred in 24.2% of all patients and in 14.3% of those with an initial serum PSA level of 10.0 ng/mL or lower. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the Gleason score showed the strongest statistical significance for biochemical failure (P = 0.001, hazard ratio 1.376, 95% confidence interval 1.056 to 1.792) for patients with a serum PSA level of 10.0 ng/mL or lower.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of prostate cancers arising in Korean men exhibit poor differentiation, regardless of the initial serum PSA level or clinical stage at presentation, and adversely affect prognosis, causing a greater rate of PSA failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17070360     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  35 in total

1.  Genome-wide detection of allelic genetic variation to predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy among prostate cancer patients using an exome SNP chip.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Seunghyun Park; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Sangchul Lee; Hak Min Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Jin-Nyoung Ho; Sungroh Yoon; Seok-Soo Byun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  The prognostic significance of percentage of tumour involvement according to disease risk group in men treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jong Jin Oh; Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Yong Yoon; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Yoon Kwan Rho; Gheeyoung Choe; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Effect of Gleason scores of lymph node metastases on prognosis of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kyungtae Ko; In Gab Jeong; Woo Suk Choi; Ju Hyun Lim; Ja Hee Suh; Ja Hyeon Ku; Yangsoon Park; Kyung Cheol Moon; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Choung-Soo Kim; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies is not enough for identifying patients eligible for hemiablative focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Young Hyo Choi; Ji Woong Yu; Min Yong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Sey Kiat Lim; Tae-Young Shin; Byung Ha Chung; Sung Joon Hong; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Preoperative Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of pT0 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Junsoo Park; In Gab Jeong; Jeong Kyoon Bang; Young Mee Cho; Jae Y Ro; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-06-21

7.  Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.

Authors:  Min Soo Choo; Sung Yong Cho; Kyungtae Ko; Chang Wook Jeong; Seung Bae Lee; Ja Hyeon Ku; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Evaluation of prostate cancer characteristics in four populations worldwide.

Authors:  Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson; Hanna Rennert; R Devi Mittal; Mohamed Jalloh; Rajeev Sachdeva; S Bruce Malkowicz; Anil Mandhani; B Mittal; Serigne M Gueye; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.344

9.  A comparison of prostate cancer detection rates by 12 or 6 core biopsy at different prostate-specific antigen densities in Korean men.

Authors:  Hyeon Jeong; Byong Chang Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Eunsik Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Tae Beom Kim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Quantification of median lobe protrusion and its impact on the base surgical margin status during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Sangchul Lee; Jong Jin Oh; Byung Ki Lee; Jung Keun Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Gheeyoung Choe; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.