Literature DB >> 21946230

The prognostic significance of percentage of tumour involvement according to disease risk group in men treated with radical prostatectomy.

Jong Jin Oh1, Sang Cheol Lee, Chang Wook Jeong, Cheol Yong Yoon, Seong Jin Jeong, Sung Kyu Hong, Seok-Soo Byun, Yoon Kwan Rho, Gheeyoung Choe, Sang Eun Lee.   

Abstract

We investigated the prognostic significance of percentage of tumour involvement (PTI) according to the clinicopathological features of prostate cancer among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). A retrospective study of 534 patients who underwent RP between September 2003 and March 2008 without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy was performed. The associations of PTI with various clinicopathological features and biochemical recurrence-free survival were examined via uni- and multivariate analyses. The predictive accuracy of the multivariate model was assessed with a receiver operating characteristics-derived area under the curve. PTI was demonstrated to be significantly associated with preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (P=0.001), pathological Gleason score (P<0.001), extraprostatic tumour extension (P<0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (P<0.001) and positive surgical margin (P<0.001) in univariate analyses. When patients were stratified into disease risk groups, PTI was an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival in multivariate analysis only among the low-risk group (P=0.033) but not the intermediate- (P=0.287) or the high-risk groups (P=0.828). The addition of the PTI did not significantly increase the accuracy of the multivariate model devised for the prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival among both total patients (P=0.459) and the low-risk group (P=0.268), respectively. In conclusion, although PTI appeared to be a more significant prognostic factor among patients with low-risk disease than among those with higher risk diseases, overall, the PTI may not provide additional prognostic information beyond what can already be obtained via established prognostic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946230      PMCID: PMC3739551          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  22 in total

1.  Histologic grade, DNA ploidy, and intraglandular tumor extent as indicators of tumor progression of clinical stage B prostatic carcinoma. A direct comparison.

Authors:  P A Humphrey; P J Walther; S M Currin; R T Vollmer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bradford A Nelson; Scott B Shappell; Sam S Chang; Nancy Wells; Scott B Farnham; Joseph A Smith; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  T A Stamey; J E McNeal; C M Yemoto; B M Sigal; I M Johnstone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Intraglandular tumor extent and prognosis in prostatic carcinoma: application of a grid method to prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  P A Humphrey; R T Vollmer
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Is body mass index associated with pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Korean men?

Authors:  Sang Eun Lee; Won Ki Lee; Min Soo Jeong; Murad Abdullajanov; Dae Sung Kim; Hong Zoo Park; Sung Jin Jeong; Cheol Yong Yoon; Seok-Soo Byun; Gheeyoung Choe; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Visual estimate of the percentage of carcinoma is an independent predictor of prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  G F Carvalhal; P A Humphrey; P Thorson; Y Yan; C G Ramos; W J Catalona
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Is tumor volume an independent prognostic factor in clinically localized prostate cancer?

Authors:  Eiji Kikuchi; Peter T Scardino; Thomas M Wheeler; Kevin M Slawin; Makoto Ohori
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Percent carcinoma in prostatectomy specimen is associated with risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with pathologically organ confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian G Ramos; Kimberly A Roehl; Jo Ann V Antenor; Peter A Humphrey; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T A Stamey; F S Freiha; J E McNeal; E A Redwine; A S Whittemore; H P Schmid
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M Carmichael; A W Partin; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Jun Yuan; Yuefang Jiang; Wei Yang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prognostic significance of six clinicopathological features for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haoran Liu; Hui Zhou; Libin Yan; Tao Ye; Hongyan Lu; Xifeng Sun; Zhangqun Ye; Hua Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.