Literature DB >> 17069313

Perception of acoustic scale and size in musical instrument sounds.

Ralph van Dinther1, Roy D Patterson.   

Abstract

There is size information in natural sounds. For example, as humans grow in height, their vocal tracts increase in length, producing a predictable decrease in the formant frequencies of speech sounds. Recent studies have shown that listeners can make fine discriminations about which of two speakers has the longer vocal tract, supporting the view that the auditory system discriminates changes on the acoustic-scale dimension. Listeners can also recognize vowels scaled well beyond the range of vocal tracts normally experienced, indicating that perception is robust to changes in acoustic scale. This paper reports two perceptual experiments designed to extend research on acoustic scale and size perception to the domain of musical sounds: The first study shows that listeners can discriminate the scale of musical instrument sounds reliably, although not quite as well as for voices. The second experiment shows that listeners can recognize the family of an instrument sound which has been modified in pitch and scale beyond the range of normal experience. We conclude that processing of acoustic scale in music perception is very similar to processing of acoustic scale in speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069313      PMCID: PMC2821800          DOI: 10.1121/1.2338295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  The lower limit of melodic pitch.

Authors:  D Pressnitzer; R D Patterson; K Krumbholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; D Pressnitzer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels.

Authors:  Peter F Assmann; William F Katz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates.

Authors:  Massimo Grassi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

5.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform.

Authors:  R D Patterson; M H Allerhand; C Giguère
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modeling temporal asymmetry in the auditory system.

Authors:  R D Patterson; T Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts.

Authors:  S M Abel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  W T Fitch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Richard Turner; Hideki Kawahara; Toshio Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Auditory size-deviant detection in adults and newborn infants.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard; Gábor P Háden; Yury Shtyrov; Roy D Patterson; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Sue L Denham; István Sziller; István Winkler
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Timbre-independent extraction of pitch in newborn infants.

Authors:  Gábor P Háden; Gábor Stefanics; Martin D Vestergaard; Susan L Denham; István Sziller; István Winkler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  The interaction of vocal characteristics and audibility in the recognition of concurrent syllables.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard; Nicholas R C Fyson; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Size does not matter: size-invariant echo-acoustic object classification.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Functional imaging of the auditory processing applied to speech sounds.

Authors:  Roy D Patterson; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Neural and behavioral investigations into timbre perception.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13

7.  Transposing musical skill: sonification of movement as concurrent augmented feedback enhances learning in a bimanual task.

Authors:  John Dyer; Paul Stapleton; Matthew Rodger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-27

8.  Neural representation of auditory size in the human voice and in sounds from other resonant sources.

Authors:  Katharina von Kriegstein; David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; D Timothy Ives; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 10.834

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.