Literature DB >> 17063909

Out of mind, but not out of sight: intentional control of visual memory.

Yuko Yotsumoto1, Robert Sekuler.   

Abstract

Does visual information enjoy automatic, obligatory entry into memory, or, after such information has been seen, can it still be actively excluded? To characterize the process by which visual information could be excluded from memory, we used Sternberg's (1966, 1975) recognition paradigm, measuring visual episodic memory for compound grating stimuli. Because recognition declines as additional study items enter memory, episodic recognition performance provides a sensitive index of memory's contents. Three experiments showed that an item occupying a fixed serial position in a series of study items could be intentionally excluded from memory. In addition, exclusion does not depend on low-level information, such as the stimulus's spatial location, orientation, or spatial frequency, and does not depend on the precise timing of irrelevant information, which suggests that the exclusionprocess is triggered by some event during a trial. The results, interpreted within the framework of a summed similarity model for visual recognition, suggest that exclusion operates after considerable visual processing of the to-be-excluded item.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063909     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Jens Schwarzbach; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Temporal gating of neural signals during performance of a visual discrimination task.

Authors:  E Seidemann; E Zohary; W T Newsome
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Decay and interference effects in visuospatial short-term memory.

Authors:  G J Hole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Preservation of episodic visual recognition memory in aging.

Authors:  Robert Sekuler; Michael J Kahana; Chris McLaughlin; Julie Golomb; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

10.  Activity of neurons in cortical area MT during a memory for motion task.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Daniel Zaksas; Jason A Droll; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  11 in total

1.  Control of working memory content in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Andrew Hollingworth; Benjamin M Robinson; Samuel T Kaiser; Carly J Leonard; Valerie M Beck; Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Saccades elicit obligatory allocation of visual working memory.

Authors:  Na Shao; Jie Li; Rende Shui; Xiaojie Zheng; Jiangang Lu; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

3.  The contents of visual memory are only partly under volitional control.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Katherine Sledge Moore; David B Drowos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

4.  Distortions in recall from visual memory: two classes of attractors at work.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A task-irrelevant stimulus attribute affects perception and short-term memory.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

7.  Older adults, unlike younger adults, do not modulate alpha power to suppress irrelevant information.

Authors:  Ryan J Vaden; Nathan L Hutcheson; Lesley A McCollum; Jonathan Kentros; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Computer vision and augmented reality in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; Jonah Cohen; Kleovoulos Tsourides; Tyler M Berzin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2015-07-01

9.  Processing speed training increases the efficiency of attentional resource allocation in young adults.

Authors:  Wesley K Burge; Lesley A Ross; Franklin R Amthor; William G Mitchell; Alexander Zotov; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Endoscopy Nurse Participation May Increase the Polyp Detection Rate by Second-Year Fellows during Screening Colonoscopies.

Authors:  Tae Sun Kim; Dong Il Park; Do Young Lee; Jang Hyuk Yoon; Jung Ho Park; Hong Joo Kim; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Jae Wan Lim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.