Literature DB >> 17062500

A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.

G K A van Wermeskerken1, A F van Olphen, G A van Zanten.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the electrically evoked compound action potentials, intra- versus post-operatively, in cochlear implant patients. In a prospective study twenty-five consecutively implanted adult patients received a multichannel cochlear implant. In all patients, electrically evoked compound action potentials were recorded immediately after cochlear implantation and in a post-operative setting nine months later. The threshold of the electrically evoked compound action potential was determined in both settings. A high success rate (97.4%) was found in the intra-operative setting when recording the electrically evoked compound action potential threshold per patient. The success rate per patient was significantly lower (53.4%) in the post-operative setting. Correlations between the intra- versus the post-operative ECAP thresholds were statistically significant for all electrodes tested. The ECAP thresholds were not significantly different for the two settings. The intra-operative setting is preferable for acquisition of the ECAP threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062500     DOI: 10.1080/14992020600833189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Michael P Barry; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Electrically elicited visual evoked potentials in Argus II retinal implant wearers.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Michael P Barry; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Characterization of the electrically evoked compound action potential of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Steven M Bierer; Leo Ling; Trey Oxford; Jay T Rubinstein; James O Phillips
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: a novel animal model for behavioral studies.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Tara Vongpaisal; Jin Xu; Robert K Shepherd; Andrew J King; Amal Isaiah
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Assessment of cochlear trauma and telemetry measures after cochlear implantation: A comparative study between Nucleus® CI512 and CI532 electrode arrays.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2019-07-11

6.  Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Gijs K A van Wermeskerken; Adriaan F van Olphen; Kees Graamans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Effect of Depth of Total Intravenous General Anesthesia on Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials in Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

Authors:  Ala A Alhowary; Abdelwahab Aleshawi; Obada Alali; Manal Kassab; Diab Bani Hani; Khaled El-Radaideh; Firas Alzoubi
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.