Literature DB >> 17062499

A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.

Dani Tomlin1, Gary Rance, Kelley Graydon, Ioanna Tsialios.   

Abstract

Evoked potential thresholds using the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) were recorded at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz test frequencies in 36 subjects with normal acuity, and 30 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. ASSR threshold sensation levels (SLs) were lower in ears with greater degrees of hearing loss, and for the 500 Hz stimulus. Mean SLs (maximum duration of a single recording: 89 seconds) were as follows at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz respectively: normal hearing group, 16.9+/-10.3 dB and 42.4+/-14.4 dB; mild-moderate group, 10.6+/-8.8 dB and 23.8+/-8.1 dB; severe-profound group, 10.0+/-13.2 dB and 21.5+/-18.9 dB. CAEP SLs showed no change with hearing level and CAEP/behavioural differences were similar at each test frequency. Mean SLs for CAEP threshold (single recording duration: 84 seconds) at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz respectively were: normal hearing group, 10.3+/-6.4 dB and 11.5+/-3.8 dB; mild-moderate group, 8.4+/-7.4 dB and 13.2+/-12.4 dB; severe-profound group, 11.0+/-6.6 dB and 15.9+/-16.4 dB. The results of this study suggest that while both 40 Hz ASSR and CAEP can reflect the behavioural audiogram, CAEPs may provide a more reliable estimate of hearing in awake adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062499     DOI: 10.1080/14992020600895170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  8 in total

1.  Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Masking Release for Speech in Modulated Maskers: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  A Michelle Tanner; Emily R Spitzer; J P Hyzy; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Uzma S Wilson; Wafaa A Kaf; Ali A Danesh; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

5.  The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  P H DeJonckere; J Lebacq
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-05-29

6.  Investigating Auditory Electrophysiological Measures of Participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Event-Related Potential Studies.

Authors:  Hadeel Y Tarawneh; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders; Hamid R Sohrabi; Ralph N Martins; Dona M P Jayakody
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

7.  Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds.

Authors:  Bahram Jalaei; Moslem Shaabani; Mohd Normani Zakaria
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-29

8.  Assessment of hearing threshold in adults with hearing loss using an automated system of cortical auditory evoked potential detection.

Authors:  Alessandra Spada Durante; Margarita Bernal Wieselberg; Nayara Roque; Sheila Carvalho; Beatriz Pucci; Nicolly Gudayol; Kátia de Almeida
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.