Literature DB >> 17062260

Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak.

M Akbar Bhat1, M Ashraf Dar, Ghulam Nabi Lone, A Majid Dar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus is the standard surgical treatment for cure or palliation. Esophagogastric anastomotic leakage is a life-threatening postoperative complication, more so if the leakage occurs in the chest.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized study was conducted on 238 patients treated for carcinoma of the esophagus between January 2000 and January 2006. The study excluded 44 patients (18.49%) who were inoperable. The patients were assigned to two treatment groups of 97 each (A and B) according to a restricted permuted block randomization plan. Group A patients underwent esophagogastrectomy with wrapping of the pedicled omentum around the esophagogastric anastomosis. Group B patients underwent esophagogastrectomy without using the omental graft. An Ivor-Lewis type esophagogastrectomy (TTE) was done in 122 patients (62.89%) and a transhiatal esophagogastrectomy (THE) was done in 72 (37.11%).
RESULTS: Anastomotic leaks occurred in 3 group A patients (3.09%) and in 14 (14.43%) group B patients. In group A, 54 patients underwent THE and 43 had TTE, with anastomotic leakage in 2 (3.70%) and 1 (2.33%) patients, respectively. In group B, 48 patients had THE and 49 had TTE, with anastomotic leakage in 8 (16.26%) and 6 (12.24%), respectively. The difference in the incidence of leakage was statistically significant (p = 0.005). There was no complication related to the omental graft technique nor was there a significant difference in the mortality between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The pedicled omental transposition for reinforcing the anastomotic suture line significantly reduces the incidence of leakage after esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus, thus decreasing the morbidity and mortality of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062260     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

Review 1.  Refinement of minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques after 15 years of experience.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Rui Wang; Shilei Liu; James D Luketich; Sufeng Chen; Haiquan Chen; Matthew J Schuchert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lara Schaheen; Shanda H Blackmon; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  The omentum: anatomical, metabolic, and surgical aspects.

Authors:  Danielle Collins; Aisling M Hogan; Donal O'Shea; Des C Winter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Esophageal Repair.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent disease after definitive chemoradiation.

Authors:  Stephen G Swisher; Jenifer Marks; David Rice
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

6.  Mediastinal transposition of the omentum reduces infection severity and pharmacy cost for patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  Peng Ye; Jin-Lin Cao; Qiu-Yuan Li; Zhi-Tian Wang; Yun-Hai Yang; Wang Lv; Jian Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Partial esophagogastrostomy with esophagogastric anastomosis below the aortic arch in cardiac carcinoma: characteristics and treatment of postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Bin Qiu; Feiyue Feng; Shugeng Gao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  K Schwameis; J Zacherl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: the evolution and technique of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe; John G Hunter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers.

Authors:  William H Allum; Luigi Bonavina; Stephen D Cassivi; Miguel A Cuesta; Zhao Ming Dong; Valter Nilton Felix; Edgar Figueredo; Piers A C Gatenby; Leonie Haverkamp; Maksat A Ibraev; Mark J Krasna; René Lambert; Rupert Langer; Michael P N Lewis; Katie S Nason; Kevin Parry; Shaun R Preston; Jelle P Ruurda; Lara W Schaheen; Roger P Tatum; Igor N Turkin; Sylvia van der Horst; Donald L van der Peet; Peter C van der Sluis; Richard van Hillegersberg; Justin C R Wormald; Peter C Wu; Barbara M Zonderhuis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.