OBJECTIVE: To define the role of BRAF gene mutation in the progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: BRAF gene mutation is frequently detected in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Its role in pathogenesis or progression is under investigation. METHODS: Patients who underwent thyroidectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy for papillary thyroid cancer were accrued. BRAF mutation was assessed in primary tumors and matched sentinel lymph nodes by a quantitative real-time PCR assay. RESULTS: Tissue specimens from 103 consecutive patients were evaluated. BRAF mutation of the primary tumor was detected in 34 (33%) patients. In 26 of 34 (76%) patients with BRAF mutation, concomitant lymph node metastasis was detected. On the contrary, in 69 patients with BRAF mutation-negative primary tumors, only 12 (17%) patients had lymph node metastasis (chi, P < 0.0001). BRAF mutation was detected in 20 of 26 (77%) lymph node metastases matched to BRAF mutation-positive primary tumors; it was not detected in lymph node metastases matched to BRAF mutation-negative primary tumors. Univariate analysis identified age, stage, tumor size, and BRAF mutation as prognostic factors for lymph node metastasis. In multivariate analysis, only BRAF mutation remained a significant prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis (odds ratio = 10.8, 95% confidence interval, 3.5-34.0, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: BRAF mutation may be a key genetic factor for the metastatic progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma. The study demonstrates that this gene mutation is a significant risk factor for locoregional lymph node metastasis and has potential utility as a surrogate marker.
OBJECTIVE: To define the role of BRAF gene mutation in the progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: BRAF gene mutation is frequently detected in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Its role in pathogenesis or progression is under investigation. METHODS:Patients who underwent thyroidectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy for papillary thyroid cancer were accrued. BRAF mutation was assessed in primary tumors and matched sentinel lymph nodes by a quantitative real-time PCR assay. RESULTS: Tissue specimens from 103 consecutive patients were evaluated. BRAF mutation of the primary tumor was detected in 34 (33%) patients. In 26 of 34 (76%) patients with BRAF mutation, concomitant lymph node metastasis was detected. On the contrary, in 69 patients with BRAF mutation-negative primary tumors, only 12 (17%) patients had lymph node metastasis (chi, P < 0.0001). BRAF mutation was detected in 20 of 26 (77%) lymph node metastases matched to BRAF mutation-positive primary tumors; it was not detected in lymph node metastases matched to BRAF mutation-negative primary tumors. Univariate analysis identified age, stage, tumor size, and BRAF mutation as prognostic factors for lymph node metastasis. In multivariate analysis, only BRAF mutation remained a significant prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis (odds ratio = 10.8, 95% confidence interval, 3.5-34.0, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:BRAF mutation may be a key genetic factor for the metastatic progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma. The study demonstrates that this gene mutation is a significant risk factor for locoregional lymph node metastasis and has potential utility as a surrogate marker.
Authors: Edna T Kimura; Marina N Nikiforova; Zhaowen Zhu; Jeffrey A Knauf; Yuri E Nikiforov; James A Fagin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Paula Soares; Vítor Trovisco; Ana Sofia Rocha; Jorge Lima; Patrícia Castro; Ana Preto; Valdemar Máximo; Tiago Botelho; Raquel Seruca; Manuel Sobrinho-Simões Journal: Oncogene Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Yoram Cohen; Mingzhao Xing; Elizabeth Mambo; Zhongmin Guo; Guogun Wu; Barry Trink; Uziel Beller; William H Westra; Paul W Ladenson; David Sidransky Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-04-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David A Kleiman; Daniel Buitrago; Michael J Crowley; Toni Beninato; Alexander J Veach; Pat B Zanzonico; Moonsoo Jin; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2012-09-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Mosin S Khan; Arshad A Pandith; Shariq R Masoodi; Khursheed A Wani; Mahboob Ul Hussain; Syed Mudassar Journal: Endocrine Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Masaru Shinozaki; Steven J O'Day; Minoru Kitago; Farin Amersi; Christine Kuo; Joseph Kim; He-Jing Wang; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Minoru Kitago; Kazuo Koyanagi; Takeshi Nakamura; Yasufumi Goto; Mark Faries; Steven J O'Day; Donald L Morton; Soldano Ferrone; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Electron Kebebew; Julie Weng; Juergen Bauer; Gustavo Ranvier; Orlo H Clark; Quan-Yang Duh; Daniel Shibru; Boris Bastian; Ann Griffin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: V Sykorova; S Dvorakova; A Ryska; J Vcelak; E Vaclavikova; J Laco; D Kodetova; R Kodet; A Cibula; J Duskova; A Hlobilkova; J Astl; D Vesely; J Betka; J Hoch; S Smutny; J Cap; P Vlcek; Z Novak; B Bendlova Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Priscilla Verhulst; Patrick Devos; Sébastien Aubert; David Buob; Isaac Cranshaw; Christine Do Cao; François Pattou; Bruno Carnaille; Jean-Louis Wemeau; Emmanuelle Leteurtre Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.064