Literature DB >> 17060629

Evolution of complexity in signaling pathways.

Orkun S Soyer1, Sebastian Bonhoeffer.   

Abstract

It is not clear how biological pathways evolve to mediate a certain physiological response and why they show a level of complexity that is generally above the minimum required to achieve such a response. One possibility is that pathway complexity increases due to the nature of evolutionary mechanisms. Here, we analyze this possibility by using mathematical models of biological pathways and evolutionary simulations. Starting with a population of small pathways of three proteins, we let the population evolve with mutations that affect pathway structure through duplication or deletion of existing proteins, deletion or creation of interactions among them, or addition of new proteins. Our simulations show that such mutational events, coupled with a selective pressure, leads to growth of pathways. These results indicate that pathways could be driven toward complexity via simple evolutionary mechanisms and that complexity can arise without any specific selective pressure for it. Furthermore, we find that the level of complexity that pathways evolve toward depends on the selection criteria. In general, we find that final pathway size tends to be lower when pathways evolve under stringent selection criteria. This leads to the counterintuitive conclusion that simple response requirements on a pathway would facilitate its evolution toward higher complexity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060629      PMCID: PMC1621048          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0604449103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T S Gardner; C R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Complexity and robustness.

Authors:  J M Carlson; John Doyle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Complexity in biological signaling systems.

Authors:  G Weng; U S Bhalla; R Iyengar
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Perspective: Evolution and detection of genetic robustness.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Joachim Hermisson; Günter P Wagner; Lauren Ancel Meyers; Homayoun Bagheri-Chaichian; Jeffrey L Blanchard; Lin Chao; James M Cheverud; Santiago F Elena; Walter Fontana; Greg Gibson; Thomas F Hansen; David Krakauer; Richard C Lewontin; Charles Ofria; Sean H Rice; George von Dassow; Andreas Wagner; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The evolutionary origin of complex features.

Authors:  Richard E Lenski; Charles Ofria; Robert T Pennock; Christoph Adami
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  On the increase in complexity in evolution.

Authors:  P T Saunders; M W Ho
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  U Alon; M G Surette; N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-01-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Neutral and Nonneutral Mutations: The Creative Mix-Evolution of Complexity in Gene Interaction Systems

Authors: 
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Robustness analysis of the Escherichia coli metabolic network.

Authors:  J S Edwards; B O Palsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

10.  Design and diversity in bacterial chemotaxis: a comparative study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Christopher V Rao; John R Kirby; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  29 in total

1.  Evolutionary origins of transcription factor binding site clusters.

Authors:  Xin He; Thyago S P C Duque; Saurabh Sinha
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  A generative bias towards average complexity in artificial cell lineages.

Authors:  Rolf Lohaus; Nicholas L Geard; Janet Wiles; Ricardo B R Azevedo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Stochasticity versus determinism: consequences for realistic gene regulatory network modelling and evolution.

Authors:  Dafyd J Jenkins; Dov J Stekel
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  From evidence to inference: probing the evolution of protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Oliver Ratmann; Carsten Wiuf; John W Pinney
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2009-10-19

5.  Modeling evolution of crosstalk in noisy signal transduction networks.

Authors:  Ammar Tareen; Ned S Wingreen; Ranjan Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.529

6.  Sharing of Phosphatases Promotes Response Plasticity in Phosphorylation Cascades.

Authors:  Bhaswar Ghosh; Uddipan Sarma; Victor Sourjik; Stefan Legewie
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  BioJazz: in silico evolution of cellular networks with unbounded complexity using rule-based modeling.

Authors:  Song Feng; Julien F Ollivier; Peter S Swain; Orkun S Soyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A Philosophical Perspective on Evolutionary Systems Biology.

Authors:  Maureen A O'Malley; Orkun S Soyer; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  Biol Theory       Date:  2015-03-01

9.  Evolution of gene regulatory networks by fluctuating selection and intrinsic constraints.

Authors:  Masaki E Tsuda; Masakado Kawata
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Making the right connections: biological networks in the light of evolution.

Authors:  Christopher G Knight; John W Pinney
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.