Literature DB >> 17059719

Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer services: can specialist units deliver?

M J Forshaw1, J A Gossage, J Stephens, D Strauss, A J Botha, S Atkinson, R C Mason.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Oesophagogastric cancer surgery is increasingly being performed in only centralised units. The aim of the study was to examine surgical outcomes and service delivery within a specialist unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The case notes of all patients undergoing attempted oesophagogastrectomy between January 2000 and May 2003 were identified from a prospective consultant database.
RESULTS: A total of 187 patients (median age, 63 years; range, 29-83 years; M:F ratio, 3.9:1) underwent attempted oesophago-gastrectomy. Of these, 91% were seen within 2 weeks of referral and treatment was instituted after a mean of 31 days (range, 1-109 days). More patients underwent surgery (63%) than neoadjuvant therapy (56%) within 1 month of referral. The main indication for surgery was invasive malignancy in 166 patients (89%). The 30-day mortality was 0.5% (1 death) and in-hospital mortality was 1.1% (2 deaths). The median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range, 7-69 days). Significant postoperative morbidity included: pulmonary complications (36%), cardiovascular complications (16%), wound infection (13%) and clinically significant anastomotic leaks (7%). Of the study group, 28 patients (15%) were admitted to ICU with a median stay of 10 days (range, 1-44 days); this accounted for 0.9% of ICU bed availability. Twelve patients (6.4%) were returned to theatre, most commonly for bleeding. The 1-year survival rates were 78%. During 2002-2003, national waiting list targets for both hernia repair and cholecystectomy were achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent increases in workload, high volume specialist units can deliver an efficient and timely service with both good treatment outcomes and minimal impact upon elective surgical waiting lists and ICU provision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17059719      PMCID: PMC1963761          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X130624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  22 in total

1.  Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy.

Authors:  J J van Lanschot; J B Hulscher; C J Buskens; H W Tilanus; F J ten Kate; H Obertop
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  S G Swisher; L Deford; K W Merriman; G L Walsh; R Smythe; A Vaporicyan; J A Ajani; T Brown; R Komaki; J A Roth; J B Putnam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Should we continue oesophageal surgery in a district general hospital? A review of 200 consecutive cases.

Authors:  G H Dickson; R Waters; J Bull; V Kaul; J Sitzia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Medical audit, cancer registration, and survival in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C R Gillis; D J Hole; R M Still; J Davis; S B Kaye
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis: results following esophagectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  R F Heitmiller; A Fischer; J R Liddicoat
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  S P Dexter; H Sue-Ling; M J McMahon; P Quirke; N Mapstone; I G Martin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Early impact of centralization of oesophageal cancer surgery services.

Authors:  G Branagan; N Davies
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Evaluation of pre- and postoperative chemotherapy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  J A Ajani; J A Roth; B Ryan; M McMurtrey; T A Rich; D E Jackson; J L Abbruzzese; B Levin; L DeCaro; C Mountain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus or cardia.

Authors:  F H Ellis
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fady Yanni; Pritam Singh; Nilanjana Tewari; Simon L Parsons; James A Catton; John Duffy; Neil T Welch; Ravinder S Vohra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center.

Authors:  Ahmed H Hamouda; Matthew J Forshaw; Kostas Tsigritis; Greg E Jones; Aliya S Noorani; Ash Rohatgi; Abraham J Botha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Prospective comparison of the perceived preoperative computed tomographic, endosonographic and histopathological stage of oesophageal cancer related to body mass indices.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; S Ashley Roberts; Jonathan D Barry; Huw Oliphant; Matthew A Morgan; Guy R J Blackshaw; Wyn G Lewis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  L H Moyes; J E Anderson; M J Forshaw
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Workload and resource implications of upper gastrointestinal cancer surgical centralisation in South East Wales.

Authors:  M A Morgan; M Goodson; X Escofet; G W B Clark; W G Lewis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Centralisation of upper-GI cancer services: is the hub quicker than the spoke?

Authors:  S J Monkhouse; J Torres-Grau; D R Bawden; C Ross; R J Krysztopik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Russell B Starkey; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Minimum volume standards in German hospitals: do they get along with procedure centralization? A retrospective longitudinal data analysis.

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Marc Malik; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Discrete-choice experiment to analyse preferences for centralizing specialist cancer surgery services.

Authors:  L Vallejo-Torres; M Melnychuk; C Vindrola-Padros; M Aitchison; C S Clarke; N J Fulop; J Hines; C Levermore; S B Maddineni; C Perry; K Pritchard-Jones; A I G Ramsay; D C Shackley; S Morris
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.