Literature DB >> 10770360

Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis: results following esophagectomy for carcinoma.

R F Heitmiller1, A Fischer, J R Liddicoat.   

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with 262 consecutive two-layer, hand-sewn cervical esophageal anastomoses in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Anastomotic leak rates were determined for the entire group and the frequency of post-operative esophageal dilatations was obtained for the first 101 patients. It was assumed that the frequency of dilatations would reflect the frequency of anastomotic strictures. The overall leak rate was 0.8% (two patients). Overall hospital mortality was 2.7%. No patient died as a result of anastomotic leakage. In our series, 26% of patients required at least one dilatation. If a dilatation was needed, the majority occurred within the first 6 months. We conclude that using a standardized, two-layer hand-sewn anastomotic technique cervical esophageal anastomoses may be performed safely with results similar to those reported using intrathoracic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10770360     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.1999.00051.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  8 in total

1.  An analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Koji Tanaka; Tomoki Makino; Makoto Yamasaki; Takahiko Nishigaki; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Managing complications II: conduit failure and conduit airway fistulas.

Authors:  Shari L Meyerson; Christopher K Mehta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Murray F Brennan; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer services: can specialist units deliver?

Authors:  M J Forshaw; J A Gossage; J Stephens; D Strauss; A J Botha; S Atkinson; R C Mason
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The split-stomach fundoplication after esophagogastrectomy.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich; Nathan Mohlberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More.

Authors:  Betty Caroline Tong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Stapled versus hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Mishra; Harsh Shah; Nikhil Gupta; Vaibhav Varshney; Nilesh Sadashiv Patil; Amit Jain; Sundeep Singh Saluja
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-04

8.  Evaluation of efficacy of endoscopic incision method in postoperative benign anastomotic strictures of gastrointestinal system.

Authors:  Ufuk Avcioglu; Şehmus Ölmez; Tuğrul Pürnak; Ersan Özaslan; Emin Altıparmak
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.318

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.