Literature DB >> 17057245

DNA damage checkpoints are involved in postreplication repair.

Leslie Barbour1, Lindsay G Ball, Ke Zhang, Wei Xiao.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae MMS2 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variant, belongs to the error-free branch of the RAD6 postreplication repair (PRR) pathway, and is parallel to the REV3-mediated mutagenesis branch. A mutation in genes of either the MMS2 or the REV3 branch does not result in extreme sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents; however, deletion of both subpathways of PRR results in a synergistic phenotype. Nevertheless, the double mutant is not as sensitive to DNA-damaging agents as a rad6 or rad18 mutant defective in the entire PRR pathway, suggesting the presence of an additional subpathway within PRR. A synthetic lethal screen was employed in the presence of a sublethal dose of a DNA-damaging agent to identify novel genes involved in PRR, which resulted in the isolation of RAD9 as a candidate PRR gene. Epistatic analysis showed that rad9 is synergistic to both mms2 and rev3 with respect to killing by methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), and the triple mutant is nearly as sensitive as the rad18 single mutant. In addition, rad9 rad18 is no more sensitive to MMS than the rad18 single mutant, suggesting that rad9 plays a role within the PRR pathway. Moreover, deletion of RAD9 reduces damage-induced mutagenesis and the mms2 spontaneous and induced mutagenesis is partially dependent on the RAD9 gene. We further demonstrated that the observed synergistic interactions apply to any two members between different branches of PRR and G1/S and G2/M checkpoint genes. These results suggest that a damage checkpoint is essential for tolerance mediated by both the error-free and error-prone branches of PRR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17057245      PMCID: PMC1698651          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.056283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  70 in total

Review 1.  Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  The repair of DNA methylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  W Xiao; B L Chow; L Rathgeber
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A Emili
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  A G Paulovich; C D Armour; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.

Authors:  S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C W Lawrence
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.944

7.  Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair.

Authors:  R M Hofmann; C M Pickart
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-03-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Regulation of alternative replication bypass pathways at stalled replication forks and its effects on genome stability: a yeast model.

Authors:  Leslie Barbour; Wei Xiao
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polzeta and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Simone Sabbioneda; Brenda K Minesinger; Michele Giannattasio; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  19 in total

1.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17 and RAD24 genes are required for suppression of mutagenic post-replicative repair during chronic DNA damage.

Authors:  Akiko Murakami-Sekimata; Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Chaitanya Bangur; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 2.  Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  DNA repair mechanisms and the bypass of DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Serge Boiteux; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Lesion bypass by S. cerevisiae Pol ζ alone.

Authors:  Jana E Stone; Dinesh Kumar; Sara K Binz; Aki Inase; Shigenori Iwai; Andrei Chabes; Peter M Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-05-31

5.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Mutation analysis of Rad18 in human cancer cell lines and non small cell lung cancer tissues.

Authors:  Tadahiko Nakamura; Shinji Ishikawa; Yoshikatsu Koga; Youhei Nagai; Yu Imamura; Kouei Ikeda; Takeshi Mori; Hiroaki Nomori; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-25

7.  Post-replication repair suppresses duplication-mediated genome instability.

Authors:  Christopher D Putnam; Tikvah K Hayes; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Comparative studies of tri- and hexavalent chromium cytotoxicity and their effects on oxidative state of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells.

Authors:  Zhiwei Huang; Xin Kuang; Zhongxiang Chen; Zhijia Fang; Song Wang; Ping Shi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  A mutation in EXO1 defines separable roles in DNA mismatch repair and post-replication repair.

Authors:  Phuoc T Tran; Julien P Fey; Naz Erdeniz; Lionel Gellon; Serge Boiteux; R Michael Liskay
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-06-29

10.  Site-specific phosphorylation of the DNA damage response mediator rad9 by cyclin-dependent kinases regulates activation of checkpoint kinase 1.

Authors:  Carla Manuela Abreu; Ramesh Kumar; Danielle Hamilton; Andrew William Dawdy; Kevin Creavin; Sarah Eivers; Karen Finn; Jeremy Lynn Balsbaugh; Rosemary O'Connor; Patrick A Kiely; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt; Muriel Grenon; Noel Francis Lowndes
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.