Literature DB >> 11553812

When genetic distance matters: measuring genetic differentiation at microsatellite loci in whole-genome scans of recent and incipient mosquito species.

R Wang1, L Zheng, Y T Touré, T Dandekar, F C Kafatos.   

Abstract

Genetic distance measurements are an important tool to differentiate field populations of disease vectors such as the mosquito vectors of malaria. Here, we have measured the genetic differentiation between Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae, as well as between proposed emerging species of the latter taxon, in whole genome scans by using 23-25 microsatellite loci. In doing so, we have reviewed and evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of standard parameters of genetic distance, F(ST), R(ST), (delta mu)(2), and D. Further, we have introduced new parameters, D' and D(K), which have well defined statistical significance tests and complement the standard parameters to advantage. D' is a modification of D, whereas D(K) is a measure of covariance based on Pearson's correlation coefficient. We find that A. gambiae and A. arabiensis are closely related at most autosomal loci but appear to be distantly related on the basis of X-linked chromosomal loci within the chromosomal Xag inversion. The M and S molecular forms of A. gambiae are practically indistinguishable but differ significantly at two microsatellite loci from the proximal region of the X, outside the Xag inversion. At one of these loci, both M and S molecular forms differ significantly from A. arabiensis, but remarkably, at the other locus, A. arabiensis is indistinguishable from the M molecular form of A. gambiae. These data support the recent proposal of genetically differentiated M and S molecular forms of A. gambiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11553812      PMCID: PMC58550          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.191003598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of ribosomal DNA polymorphisms discriminating among chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Authors:  G Favia; A Lanfrancotti; L Spanos; I Sidén-Kiamos; C Louis
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.585

2.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci.

Authors:  M D Shriver; L Jin; E Boerwinkle; R Deka; R E Ferrell; R Chakraborty
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci.

Authors:  D B Goldstein; A Ruiz Linares; L L Cavalli-Sforza; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Analysis of genetic variability in Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae using microsatellite loci.

Authors:  L Kamau; W R Mukabana; W A Hawley; T Lehmann; L W Irungu; A A Orago; F H Collins
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.585

7.  Microsatellite variation and the differentiation of modern humans.

Authors:  A Pérez-Lezaun; F Calafell; E Mateu; D Comas; R Ruiz-Pacheco; J Bertranpetit
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  A microsatellite-based multilocus phylogeny of the Drosophila melanogaster species complex.

Authors:  B Harr; S Weiss; J R David; G Brem; C Schlötterer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-10-22       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environments in the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  M Coluzzi; A Sabatini; V Petrarca; M A Di Deco
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.184

10.  Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models.

Authors:  A Estoup; L Garnery; M Solignac; J M Cornuet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  24 in total

1.  Transfer and origin of adaptations through natural hybridization: were Anderson and Stebbins right?

Authors:  Michael L Arnold
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  No evidence for biased co-transmission of speciation islands in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Bradley J White; Christopher D Muir; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Reduced recombination rate and genetic differentiation between the M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Authors:  Michel A Slotman; Lisa J Reimer; Tara Thiemann; Guimogo Dolo; Etienne Fondjo; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Ecological zones rather than molecular forms predict genetic differentiation in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. in Ghana.

Authors:  Alexander E Yawson; David Weetman; Michael D Wilson; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of gene flow and hybrid fitness between the M and S forms of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Yoosook Lee; Clare D Marsden; Laura C Norris; Travis C Collier; Bradley J Main; Abdrahamane Fofana; Anthony J Cornel; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A new multiplex SNP genotyping assay for detecting hybridization and introgression between the M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Yoosook Lee; Clare D Marsden; Catelyn Nieman; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  Sex-linked differentiation between incipient species of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Aram D Stump; Jennifer A Shoener; Carlo Costantini; N'Fale Sagnon; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Rapid discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis by High-Resolution Melt (HRM) analysis.

Authors:  Michael R Zianni; Mahmood R Nikbakhtzadeh; Bryan T Jackson; Jenny Panescu; Woodbridge A Foster
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-04

9.  Gene flow between chromosomal forms of the malaria vector Anopheles funestus in Cameroon, Central Africa, and its relevance in malaria fighting.

Authors:  Anna Cohuet; Ibrahima Dia; Frédéric Simard; Michel Raymond; François Rousset; Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio; Parfait H Awono-Ambene; Charles S Wondji; Didier Fontenille
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Locus-specific genetic differentiation at Rw among warfarin-resistant rat (Rattus norvegicus) populations.

Authors:  Michael H Kohn; Hans-Joachim Pelz; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.