Literature DB >> 22381161

Usefulness of the left ventricular myocardial contraction fraction in healthy men and women to predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Michael L Chuang1, Philimon Gona, Carol J Salton, Susan B Yeon, Kraig V Kissinger, Susan J Blease, Daniel Levy, Christopher J O'Donnell, Warren J Manning.   

Abstract

We sought to determine whether depressed myocardial contraction fraction (MCF; ratio of left ventricular [LV] stroke volume to myocardial volume) predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in initially healthy adults. A subset (n = 318, 60 ± 9 years old, 158 men) of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort free of clinical CVD underwent volumetric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in 1998 through 1999. LV ejection fraction (EF), mass, and MCF were determined. "Hard" CVD events consisted of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new heart failure. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for Framingham Coronary Risk Score was used to estimate hazard ratios for incident hard CVD events for gender-specific quartiles of MCF, LV mass, and LVEF. The lowest quartile of LV mass and highest quartiles of MCF and EF served as referents. Kaplan-Meier survival plots and log-rank test were used to compare event-free survival. MCF was greater in women (0.58 ± 0.13) than in men (0.52 ± 0.11, p <0.01). Nearly all participants (99%) had EF ≥0.55. During an up to 9-year follow-up (median 5.2), 31 participants (10%) developed an incident hard CVD event. Lowest-quartile MCF was 7 times more likely to develop a hard CVD (hazard ratio 7.11, p = 0.010) compared to the remaining quartiles, and increased hazards persisted even after adjustment for LV mass (hazard ratio 6.09, p = 0.020). The highest-quartile LV mass/height 2.7 had a nearly fivefold risk (hazard ratio 4.68, p = 0.016). Event-free survival was shorter in lowest-quartile MCF (p = 0.0006) but not in lowest-quartile LVEF. In conclusion, in a cohort of adults initially without clinical CVD, lowest-quartile MCF conferred an increased hazard for hard CVD events after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors and LV mass.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22381161      PMCID: PMC3742100          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  Sensitivity encoded cardiac MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; P Boesiger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Geometric changes allow normal ejection fraction despite depressed myocardial shortening in hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  G P Aurigemma; K H Silver; M A Priest; W H Gaasch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  R S Vasan; M G Larson; E J Benjamin; J C Evans; C K Reiss; D Levy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Left ventricular chamber and wall mechanics in the presence of concentric geometry.

Authors:  G de Simone; R B Devereux; A Celentano; M J Roman
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Accurate computer-aided quantification of left ventricular parameters: experience in 1555 cardiac magnetic resonance studies from the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Gilion L T F Hautvast; Carol J Salton; Michael L Chuang; Marcel Breeuwer; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Myocardial contraction fraction: a volumetric index of myocardial shortening by freehand three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Donald L King; Lyna El-Khoury Coffin; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Midwall left ventricular mechanics. An independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension.

Authors:  G de Simone; R B Devereux; M J Koren; G A Mensah; P N Casale; J H Laragh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; M Feinleib; P M McNamara; R J Garrison; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension.

Authors:  M J Koren; R B Devereux; P N Casale; D D Savage; J H Laragh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  8 in total

1.  Relation of the Myocardial Contraction Fraction, as Calculated from M-Mode Echocardiography, With Incident Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality (Results from the Cardiovascular Health Study).

Authors:  Mathew S Maurer; William J H Koh; Traci M Bartz; Sirish Vullaganti; Eddy Barasch; Julius M Gardin; John S Gottdiener; Bruce M Psaty; Jorge R Kizer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Exposure to occupational air pollution and cardiac function in workers of the Esfahan Steel Industry, Iran.

Authors:  Jafar Golshahi; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Mohammad Saqira; Reihaneh Zavar; Mostafa Sadeghifar; Hamidreza Roohafza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Population-based imaging biobanks as source of big data.

Authors:  Sergios Gatidis; Sophia D Heber; Corinna Storz; Fabian Bamberg
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Comparison of Nonclassic and Classic Phenotype of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Focused on Prognostic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parameters: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Authors:  Magdalena Stachera; Paweł Przybyło; Katarzyna Sznajder; Marek Gierlotka
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Association between reduced myocardial contraction fraction and cardiovascular disease outcomes: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Marwah Abdalla; Elvis A Akwo; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima; Daichi Shimbo; Mathew S Maurer; Alain G Bertoni
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Myocardial Contraction Fraction is Superior to Ejection Fraction in Predicting Functional Capacity in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Yasser A Abdellatif; Hassan A Addow; Ramy R Elias
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Echocardiographic Investigation of Low-Flow State in a Hispanic/Latino Population.

Authors:  Patrick M Kozak; Min Pu; Katrina Swett; Martha L Daviglus; Mayank M Kansal; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Sonia G Ponce; Robert Kaplan; Mario Garcia; Carlos J Rodriguez
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-31

8.  Myocardial contraction fraction predicts mortality for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hang Liao; Ziqiong Wang; Liming Zhao; Xiaoping Chen; Sen He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.