Literature DB >> 17056783

Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size.

D M Shafer1, Y Khajanchee, J Wong, L L Swanström.   

Abstract

Trocar designs have evolved in response to concerns about complication rates and surgical ergonomics. Functional properties of trocar systems that can be objectively measured include insertion force, removal force and the size of the tissue defect. This study will evaluate these properties in 5 common trocar designs. A porcine model was used to evaluate five different trocar systems for insertion force, removal force, and functional and measured tissue defect. Insertion force was lowest for cutting trocars and highest for radially dilating trocars. Removal force was similar for all trocars. Functional and measured tissue defect size was smallest for the hybrid type and radially dilating trocars. An ideal trocar system incorporates a low insertion force, secure retention, and a minimal tissue defect. Of the systems we tested, the hybrid type trocar has similar wound characteristics to the radially dilating trocar with the benefit of reduced insertion force. Further study is required to determine if these properties translate to an actual improvement in patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17056783     DOI: 10.1177/1553350606294247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  9 in total

1.  Functional luminal imaging probe geometric and histomorphologic analysis of abdominal wall wound induced by different trocars in pigs.

Authors:  Jingbo Zhao; Donghua Liao; Barry P McMahon; Deidre O'Donovan; Rich Schiretz; Russell Heninrich; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Benchtop evaluation of pressure barrier insufflator and standard insufflator systems.

Authors:  Kenneth G Nepple; Dorina Kallogjeri; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Port insertion for minimally invasive surgery: a report of practices in the Irish Republic.

Authors:  Cuan M Harrington; Dara O Kavanagh; Sean Tierney; Richard Deane; Dermot Hehir
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Trocar Port Hernias After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Usha K Coblijn; Christel A L de Raaff; Bart A van Wagensveld; Willem F van Tets; Steve M M de Castro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David Mark Bunting
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Saving time during laparoscopy using a new, wall anchoring trocar device.

Authors:  Garri Tchartchian; Joanna Dietzel; Mark W Surrey; Rudy L Dewilde; Bernd Bojahr
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Reduced-force closed trocar entry technique: analysis of trocar insertion force using a mechanical force gauge.

Authors:  James Fanning; Manish Shah; Bradford Fenton
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic Insertion of Various Shaped Trocars in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Danilo Galante Moreno; Cesar Augusto Martins Pereira; Ricardo Kyoiti Sant Anna; Rafael Ulysses de Azevedo; Luiz Felipe Savio; Ricardo Jordão Duarte; Miguel Srougi; Carlo Camargo Passerotti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.