BACKGROUND: Family members of laboratory animal workers are at risk of developing allergy to laboratory animals. Little is known about the spreading of laboratory animal allergens outside the animal facilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence of laboratory animal allergens in dust collected from mattresses of laboratory animal workers and unexposed controls. METHODS: Mouse and rat urinary proteins were measured in samples of mattress dust collected by laboratory animal workers and unexposed controls. In addition, rat and mouse allergens were determined in extracts of hair-covering caps, used during laboratory animal work, to estimate spreading of allergen through dust captured on hair. Allergen concentrations on hair caps were compared with exposure measured by personal airborne dust sampling. RESULTS: Levels of rat urinary allergens (RUA) and mouse urinary allergens (MUA) and mouse urinary protein (MUP) 8, a specific pheromone-binding mouse allergen, were significantly higher in mattress samples of laboratory animal workers than in those of controls. Hair-covering caps used in animal facilities harboured large amounts of RUA and MUA, which correlated significantly with exposure measured by the personal sampling technique in the animal facility. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational laboratory animal allergens are detectable in mattress dust of laboratory animal workers. Transfer of allergens via uncovered hair of animal workers is likely contributing to this phenomenon. This study stresses the importance of using hair caps to prevent spreading of occupational allergens.
BACKGROUND: Family members of laboratory animal workers are at risk of developing allergy to laboratory animals. Little is known about the spreading of laboratory animal allergens outside the animal facilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence of laboratory animal allergens in dust collected from mattresses of laboratory animal workers and unexposed controls. METHODS:Mouse and rat urinary proteins were measured in samples of mattress dust collected by laboratory animal workers and unexposed controls. In addition, rat and mouse allergens were determined in extracts of hair-covering caps, used during laboratory animal work, to estimate spreading of allergen through dust captured on hair. Allergen concentrations on hair caps were compared with exposure measured by personal airborne dust sampling. RESULTS: Levels of rat urinary allergens (RUA) and mouse urinary allergens (MUA) and mouseurinary protein (MUP) 8, a specific pheromone-binding mouse allergen, were significantly higher in mattress samples of laboratory animal workers than in those of controls. Hair-covering caps used in animal facilities harboured large amounts of RUA and MUA, which correlated significantly with exposure measured by the personal sampling technique in the animal facility. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational laboratory animal allergens are detectable in mattress dust of laboratory animal workers. Transfer of allergens via uncovered hair of animal workers is likely contributing to this phenomenon. This study stresses the importance of using hair caps to prevent spreading of occupational allergens.
Authors: D Schram-Bijkerk; G Doekes; M Boeve; J Douwes; J Riedler; E Ublagger; E von Mutius; J Budde; G Pershagen; M van Hage; M Wickman; C Braun-Fahrländer; M Waser; B Brunekreef Journal: Allergy Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: R T van Strien; L P Koopman; M Kerkhof; M Oldenwening; J C de Jongste; J Gerritsen; H J Neijens; R C Aalberse; H A Smit; B Brunekreef Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Elizabeth C Matsui; Esmeralda J M Krop; Gregory B Diette; Rob C Aalberse; Abigail L Smith; Peyton A Eggleston Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Ginger L Chew; Matthew S Perzanowski; Rachel L Miller; Juan C Correa; Lori A Hoepner; Carlos M Jusino; Mark G Becker; Patrick L Kinney Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Daniel A Domer; Rebecca L Erickson; Joann M Petty; Valerie K Bergdall; Judy M Hickman-Davis Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Ilka Noss; Inge M Wouters; Maaike Visser; Dick J J Heederik; Peter S Thorne; Bert Brunekreef; Gert Doekes Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jean Curtin-Brosnan; Beverly Paigen; Karol A Hagberg; Stephen Langley; Elise A O'Neil; Mary Krevans; Peyton A Eggleston; Elizabeth C Matsui Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Wanda Phipatanakul; Elizabeth Matsui; Jay Portnoy; P Brock Williams; Charles Barnes; Kevin Kennedy; David Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; Linda Cox; David Khan; David Lang; Richard Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Christopher Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon Spector; Stephen A Tilles; Dana Wallace; James Sublett; Jonathan Bernstein; Carl Grimes; J David Miller; James Seltzer Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.347