Literature DB >> 9860267

Attentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes. Differential interference effects.

U Castiello1.   

Abstract

The role played by the attentional mechanisms that enable dominance of relevant objects over distractor objects was investigated by measuring changes in the kinematics of the reach-to-grasp movement. Subjects reached towards three-dimensional (3D) stimuli while attention was diverted towards distracting information consisting of either two-dimensional (2D) projected shapes or 3D objects. Movement kinematics were influenced to a greater degree when a secondary task was performed involving a 3D object rather than a 2D projected shape. When the distractor was 3D, both the reaching and the grasping components were altered but, when it was 2D only, the reaching component was modified. It is suggested that, when attention is directed towards a distractor, it is associated with interference in the kinematics of the action towards the target. Further, the nature and dimensions of the distractor selectively influence the reach or the grasp component of a prehension movement.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9860267     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  Grasping the meaning of words.

Authors:  Scott Glover; David A Rosenbaum; Jeremy Graham; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Veronica Tognin; Luca Turella; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?

Authors:  Scott D Squires; Scott N Macdonald; Jody C Culham; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Monkey see, monkey reach: action selection of reaching movements in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Luisa Sartori; Andrea Camperio-Ciani; Maria Bulgheroni; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A direct effect of perception on action when grasping a cup.

Authors:  E Rounis; V van Polanen; M Davare
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  On the evolution of handedness: evidence for feeding biases.

Authors:  Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.