Literature DB >> 17049674

Model use in phylogenetics: nine key questions.

Scot A Kelchner1, Michael A Thomas.   

Abstract

Models of character evolution underpin all phylogeny estimations, thus model adequacy remains a crucial issue for phylogenetics and its many applications. Although progress has been made in selecting appropriate models for phylogeny estimation, there is still concern about their purpose and proper use. How do we interpret models in a phylogenetic context? What are their effects on phylogeny estimation? How can we improve confidence in the models that we choose? That the phylogenetics community is asking such questions denotes an important stage in the use of explicit models. Here, we examine these and other common questions and draw conclusions about how the community is using and choosing models, and where this process will take us next.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17049674     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  27 in total

1.  Assessment of substitution model adequacy using frequentist and Bayesian methods.

Authors:  Jennifer Ripplinger; Jack Sullivan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Phylogenetic inference with weighted codon evolutionary distances.

Authors:  Alexis Criscuolo; Christian J Michel
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Deep phylogeny--how a tree can help characterize early life on Earth.

Authors:  Eric A Gaucher; James T Kratzer; Ryan N Randall
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Origin of year-long bean (Phaseolus dumosus Macfady, Fabaceae) from reticulated hybridization events between multiple Phaseolus species.

Authors:  Angela M Mina-Vargas; Peter C McKeown; Nicola S Flanagan; Daniel G Debouck; Andrzej Kilian; Trevor R Hodkinson; Charles Spillane
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Analyses of evolutionary dynamics in viruses are hindered by a time-dependent bias in rate estimates.

Authors:  Sebastián Duchêne; Edward C Holmes; Simon Y W Ho
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Biophysical constraints on the evolution of tissue structure and function.

Authors:  P J Hunter; B de Bono
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Enrichment of Hydrogen Oxidizing Bacteria from High Temperature and Salinity Environments.

Authors:  Raquel G Barbosa; H Pieter J van Veelen; Vanessa Pinheiro; Tom Sleutels; Willy Verstraete; Nico Boon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Sensitivity of Ribosomal RNA Character Sampling in the Phylogeny of Rhabditida.

Authors:  Oleksandr Holovachov; Lauren Camp; Steven A Nadler
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.402

9.  Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

Authors:  Björn M von Reumont; Karen Meusemann; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Emiliano Dell'Ampio; Vivek Gowri-Shankar; Daniela Bartel; Sabrina Simon; Harald O Letsch; Roman R Stocsits; Yun-xia Luan; Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Günther Pass; Heike Hadrys; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  A mitogenomic re-evaluation of the bdelloid phylogeny and relationships among the Syndermata.

Authors:  Erica Lasek-Nesselquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.