Literature DB >> 24882821

Biophysical constraints on the evolution of tissue structure and function.

P J Hunter1, B de Bono2.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses based on models of molecular sequence evolution have driven to industrial scale the generation, cataloguing and modelling of nucleic acid and polypeptide structure. The recent application of these techniques to study the evolution of protein interaction networks extends this analytical rigour to the study of nucleic acid and protein function. Can we further extend phylogenetic analysis of protein networks to the study of tissue structure and function? If the study of tissue phylogeny is to join up with mainstream efforts in the molecular evolution domain, the continuum field description of tissue biophysics must be linked to discrete descriptions of molecular biochemistry. In support of this goal we discuss tissue units, and biophysical constraints to molecular function associated with these units, to present a rationale with which to model tissue evolution. Our rationale combines a multiscale hierarchy of functional tissue units (FTUs) with the corresponding application of physical laws to describe molecular interaction networks and flow processes over continuum fields within these units. Non-dimensional numbers, derived from the equations governing biophysical processes in FTUs, are proposed as metrics for comparative studies across individuals, species or evolutionary time. We also outline the challenges inherent to the systematic cataloguing and phylogenetic analysis of tissue features relevant to the maintenance and regulation of molecular interaction networks. These features are key to understanding the core biophysical constraints on tissue evolution.
© 2014 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2014 The Physiological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24882821      PMCID: PMC4048097          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.273235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  26 in total

Review 1.  The place of phylogeny and cladistics in Evo-Devo research.

Authors:  Maximilian J Telford; Graham E Budd
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.203

2.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks.

Authors:  S Henikoff; J G Henikoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Where did the BLOSUM62 alignment score matrix come from?

Authors:  Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties.

Authors:  James R Perkins; Ilhem Diboun; Benoit H Dessailly; Jon G Lees; Christine Orengo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  The number and distribution of capillaries in muscles with calculations of the oxygen pressure head necessary for supplying the tissue.

Authors:  A Krogh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1919-05-20       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  R B Russell; G J Barton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Exploiting structural classifications for function prediction: towards a domain grammar for protein function.

Authors:  Benoît H Dessailly; Oliver C Redfern; Alison Cuff; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data.

Authors:  Michele Magrane
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  SCOPe: Structural Classification of Proteins--extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures.

Authors:  Naomi K Fox; Steven E Brenner; John-Marc Chandonia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes.

Authors:  Lisa Matthews; Gopal Gopinath; Marc Gillespie; Michael Caudy; David Croft; Bernard de Bono; Phani Garapati; Jill Hemish; Henning Hermjakob; Bijay Jassal; Alex Kanapin; Suzanna Lewis; Shahana Mahajan; Bruce May; Esther Schmidt; Imre Vastrik; Guanming Wu; Ewan Birney; Lincoln Stein; Peter D'Eustachio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evolution evolves: physiology returns to centre stage.

Authors:  Denis Noble; Eva Jablonka; Michael J Joyner; Gerd B Müller; Stig W Omholt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Meeting the multiscale challenge: representing physiology processes over ApiNATOMY circuits using bond graphs.

Authors:  B de Bono; S Safaei; P Grenon; P Hunter
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Representing Normal and Abnormal Physiology as Routes of Flow in ApiNATOMY.

Authors:  Bernard de Bono; Tom Gillespie; Monique C Surles-Zeigler; Natallia Kokash; Jeff S Grethe; Maryann Martone
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  The Open Physiology workflow: modeling processes over physiology circuitboards of interoperable tissue units.

Authors:  Bernard de Bono; Soroush Safaei; Pierre Grenon; David P Nickerson; Samuel Alexander; Michiel Helvensteijn; Joost N Kok; Natallia Kokash; Alan Wu; Tommy Yu; Peter Hunter; Richard A Baldock
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Physical and geometric determinants of transport in fetoplacental microvascular networks.

Authors:  Alexander Erlich; Philip Pearce; Romina Plitman Mayo; Oliver E Jensen; Igor L Chernyavsky
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Liquid-crystal organization of liver tissue.

Authors:  Hernán Morales-Navarrete; Hidenori Nonaka; André Scholich; Fabián Segovia-Miranda; Walter de Back; Kirstin Meyer; Roman L Bogorad; Victor Koteliansky; Lutz Brusch; Yannis Kalaidzidis; Frank Jülicher; Benjamin M Friedrich; Marino Zerial
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.