Literature DB >> 17048885

Potential energy and free energy landscapes.

David J Wales1, Tetyana V Bogdan.   

Abstract

Familiar concepts for small molecules may require reinterpretation for larger systems. For example, rearrangements between geometrical isomers are usually considered in terms of transitions between the corresponding local minima on the underlying potential energy surface, V. However, transitions between bulk phases such as solid and liquid, or between the denatured and native states of a protein, are normally addressed in terms of free energy minima. To reestablish a connection with the potential energy surface we must think in terms of representative samples of local minima of V, from which a free energy surface is projected by averaging over most of the coordinates. The present contribution outlines how this connection can be developed into a tool for quantitative calculations. In particular, stepping between the local minima of V provides powerful methods for locating the global potential energy minimum, and for calculating global thermodynamic properties. When the transition states that link local minima are also sampled we can exploit statistical rate theory to obtain insight into global dynamics and rare events. Visualizing the potential energy landscape helps to explain how the network of local minima and transition states determines properties such as heat capacity features, which signify transitions between free energy minima. The organization of the landscape also reveals how certain systems can reliably locate particular structures on the experimental time scale from among an exponentially large number of local minima. Such directed searches not only enable proteins to overcome Levinthal's paradox but may also underlie the formation of "magic numbers" in molecular beams, the self-assembly of macromolecular structures, and crystallization.

Year:  2006        PMID: 17048885     DOI: 10.1021/jp0680544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  27 in total

1.  Exploring the energy landscapes of protein folding simulations with Bayesian computation.

Authors:  Nikolas S Burkoff; Csilla Várnai; Stephen A Wells; David L Wild
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Protein fluxes along the filopodium as a framework for understanding the growth-retraction dynamics: the interplay between diffusion and active transport.

Authors:  Pavel I Zhuravlev; Garegin A Papoian
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Nanomanufacturing: A Perspective.

Authors:  J Alexander Liddle; Gregg M Gallatin
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Evidence from mixed hydrate nucleation for a funnel model of crystallization.

Authors:  Kyle Wm Hall; Sheelagh Carpendale; Peter G Kusalik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Generating conformational transition paths with low potential-energy barriers for proteins.

Authors:  Minh Khoa Nguyen; Léonard Jaillet; Stéphane Redon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  A Nonquiescent "Idling" Population State in Drug-Treated, BRAF-Mutated Melanoma.

Authors:  B Bishal Paudel; Leonard A Harris; Keisha N Hardeman; Arwa A Abugable; Corey E Hayford; Darren R Tyson; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A spin-1 representation for dual-funnel energy landscapes.

Authors:  Justin E Elenewski; Kirill A Velizhanin; Michael Zwolak
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Coarse-grained model for colloidal protein interactions, B(22), and protein cluster formation.

Authors:  Marco A Blanco; Erinc Sahin; Anne S Robinson; Christopher J Roberts
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Hierarchical organization of eglin c native state dynamics is shaped by competing direct and water-mediated interactions.

Authors:  Christopher Kroboth Materese; Christa Charisse Goldmon; Garegin A Papoian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  An in vitro model of tumor heterogeneity resolves genetic, epigenetic, and stochastic sources of cell state variability.

Authors:  Corey E Hayford; Darren R Tyson; C Jack Robbins; Peter L Frick; Vito Quaranta; Leonard A Harris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.