Literature DB >> 17047019

Fat mass is not beneficial to bone in adolescents and young adults.

Agnieszka Janicka1, Tishya A L Wren, Monique M Sanchez, Frederick Dorey, Paul S Kim, Steven D Mittelman, Vicente Gilsanz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although muscle mass is beneficial to bone, studies on the effect of fat mass on bone have yielded conflicting results.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the relations between lean and fat mass and bone structure.
DESIGN: This study was cross-sectional.
SETTING: The study was conducted in a general community.
SUBJECTS: Subjects included 300 healthy sexually mature adolescents and young adults (150 males and 150 females) between the ages of 13 and 21 yr. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We investigated the relation between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures of total body fat and lean mass and bone values obtained with DXA (legs and lumbar spine bone mineral density and bone mineral content) and computed tomography (CT) (cross-sectional and cortical bone areas of the femurs and cross-sectional area and cancellous bone density of the vertebrae).
RESULTS: Simple and multiple linear regression analyses showed significant positive relations between DXA lean mass and all CT and DXA measures of bone in the axial and appendicular skeletons (all P < 0.005). In contrast, whereas Pearson correlations between DXA measures of fat mass and bone parameters were generally positive, multiple regression analyses showed that fat mass, after accounting for lean mass, trunk height/leg length, had a negative, or no, correlation with CT and DXA values for bone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide compelling evidence that, despite increased mechanical loading and independent of lean mass, adipose tissue is not beneficial to bone structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17047019     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-0794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  100 in total

1.  Cross-sectional versus longitudinal associations of lean and fat mass with pQCT bone outcomes in children.

Authors:  Howard E Wey; Teresa L Binkley; Tianna M Beare; Christine L Wey; Bonny L Specker
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  DXA surrogates for visceral fat are inversely associated with bone density measures in adolescent athletes with menstrual dysfunction.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Brittany Davis; Leah Jacoby; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.634

3.  Bone and fat relationships in postadolescent black females: a pQCT study.

Authors:  N K Pollock; E M Laing; M W Hamrick; C A Baile; D B Hall; R D Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Associations of fat mass and fat distribution with bone mineral density in pre- and postmenopausal Chinese women.

Authors:  X Fu; X Ma; H Lu; W He; Z Wang; S Zhu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Lower bone mass in prepubertal overweight children with prediabetes.

Authors:  Norman K Pollock; Paul J Bernard; Karl Wenger; Sudipta Misra; Barbara A Gower; Jerry D Allison; Haidong Zhu; Catherine L Davis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  The muscle-bone unit of peripheral and central skeletal sites in children and young adults.

Authors:  R L Ashby; J E Adams; S A Roberts; M Z Mughal; K A Ward
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Relationships between fat and bone.

Authors:  I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  The role of leptin in regulating bone metabolism.

Authors:  Jagriti Upadhyay; Olivia M Farr; Christos S Mantzoros
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 8.694

9.  Tibia and radius bone geometry and volumetric density in obese compared to non-obese adolescents.

Authors:  Mary B Leonard; Babette S Zemel; Brian H Wrotniak; Sarah B Klieger; Justine Shults; Virginia A Stallings; Nicolas Stettler
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Reciprocal relation between marrow adiposity and the amount of bone in the axial and appendicular skeleton of young adults.

Authors:  Natascia Di Iorgi; Michael Rosol; Steven D Mittelman; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.