Literature DB >> 17043736

Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI-comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences.

Thomas Schlosser1, Nasser Malyar, Markus Jochims, Frank Breuckmann, Peter Hunold, Oliver Bruder, Raimund Erbel, Jörg Barkhausen.   

Abstract

We compared two different magnetic resonance (MR) sequences [steady-state free precession (SSFP) and gradient echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH)] for the assessment of aortic valve areas in aortic stenosis using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the standard of reference. Thirty-two patients with known aortic stenosis underwent MR (1.5 T) using a cine SSFP sequence and a cine FLASH sequence. Planimetry was performed in cross-sectional images and compared to the results of the TEE. In seven patients the grade of stenosis was additionally assessed by invasive cardiac catheterization (ICC). The mean aortic valve area measured by TEE was 0.97+/-0.19 mm(2), 1.00+/-0.25 mm(2) for SSFP and 1.25+/-0.23 mm(2) based on FLASH images. The mean difference between the valve areas assessed based on SSFP and TEE images was 0.15+/-0.13 cm(2) (FLASH vs TEE: 0.29+/-0.17 cm(2)). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that measurements using FLASH images overestimated the aortic valve area compared to TEE. Comparing ICC with MRI and TEE, only a weak to moderate correlation was found (ICC vs TEE: R=0.52, p=0.22; ICC vs SSFP: R=0.20, p=0.65; ICC vs FLASH: R=0.16, p=0.70). Measurements of the aortic valve area based on SSFP images correlate better with TEE compared to FLASH images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17043736     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0437-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study.

Authors:  J Barkhausen; S G Ruehm; M Goyen; T Buck; G Laub; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Fully refocused gradient recalled echo (FRGRE): factors affecting flow and motion sensitivity in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Laurie B Hildebrand; Michael H Buonocore
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Assessment of left ventricular function by breath-hold cine MR imaging: Comparison of different steady-state free precession sequences.

Authors:  R Peter Kunz; Florian Oellig; Frank Krummenauer; Katja Oberholzer; Bernd Romaneehsen; Toni W Vomweg; Georg Horstick; Carmel Hayes; Manfred Thelen; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J C Tardif; A G Rodrigues; J F Hardy; Y Leclerc; R Petitclerc; R Mongrain; L A Mercier
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Changing aspects of the natural history of valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  A Selzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  C M Otto; A S Pearlman; K A Comess; R P Reamer; C L Janko; L L Huntsman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  MDCT evaluation of aortic valvular disease.

Authors:  Robert C Gilkeson; Alan H Markowitz; Amit Balgude; Peter B Sachs
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity.

Authors:  Damien Garcia; Jean G Dumesnil; Louis-Gilles Durand; Lyes Kadem; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Shelton D Caruthers; Shiow Jiuan Lin; Peggy Brown; Mary P Watkins; Todd A Williams; Katherine A Lehr; Samuel A Wickline
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Flow measurements in cardiac MRI].

Authors:  J Lotz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Imaging technique and current status of valvular heart disease using cardiac MRI].

Authors:  J Lotz; J M Sohns
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Imaging for planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  H A Hildebrandt; A A Mahabadi; M Totzeck; R A Jánosi; A Y Lind; T Rassaf; P Kahlert
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Valvular heart disease: what does cardiovascular MRI add?

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Steven Dymarkowski; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; André Rudolph; Ralf Wassmuth; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Quantification of congenital aortic valve stenosis in pediatric patients: comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Selma Sirin; Kai Nassenstein; Ulrich Neudorf; Christoph J Jensen; Christian Mikat; Thomas Schlosser
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 7.  Aortic stenosis: evaluation with multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging.

Authors:  Eun Ju Chun; Sang Il Choi; Cheong Lim; Kye-Hyun Park; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Dong-Ju Choi; Dong Hun Kim; Whal Lee; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.