Literature DB >> 21069578

Malignant pheochromocytoma: predictive factors of malignancy and clinical course in 16 patients at a single tertiary medical center.

Auryan Szalat1, Merav Fraenkel, Victoria Doviner, Asher Salmon, David J Gross.   

Abstract

Metastases appear in approximately 10% of patients with pheochromocytoma. There is no predictive marker of malignancy. The aim is to describe clinical course of patients with malignant pheochromocytoma and to identify predictive features of malignancy. The method involves retrospective analysis of patients files diagnosed with malignant pheochromocytoma at our institution between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2008. We identified 16 patients with malignant pheochromocytoma. There were more men than women (10/6). Mean age of patients at time of diagnosis was 37.75-year-old. Time of occurrence of metastases ranged from 0 to 22 years after first diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. The mean size of the primary tumor was 12.1 cm. High levels of chromogranin A at the time of diagnosis were associated with the presence of metastases. The pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland scoring scale (PASS) histological evaluation in adrenal primary tumors was above four in all cases but one. All patients had initial surgery, followed in most cases by palliative therapy: chemotherapy (streptozocin, cyclophosphamide-vincristine-dacarbazine, thalidomide, imatinib, everolimus) or (131)I-MIBG; only the latter had replicable encouraging response evaluation criteria in solid tumor response rates. We observed a 10-year survival rate of 50% after initial diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, and 25% after diagnosis of metastasis. Metastasis can occur very late after the initial diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. High chromogranin A levels may be associated with the presence of metastases and poor prognosis. Histological adrenal PASS higher than 4 appears to be suggestive of malignancy. The best therapeutic approach remains to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21069578     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-010-9422-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  29 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Long-term outcome of a large series of patients surgically treated for pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  A Khorram-Manesh; H Ahlman; O Nilsson; P Friberg; A Odén; G Stenström; G Hansson; O Stenquist; B Wängberg; L-E Tisell; S Jansson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Pheochromocytomas: can malignant potential be predicted?

Authors:  H John; W H Ziegler; D Hauri; P Jaeger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  G Eisenhofer; M M Walther; T T Huynh; S T Li; S R Bornstein; A Vortmeyer; M Mannelli; D S Goldstein; W M Linehan; J W Lenders; K Pacak
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Proliferative index in phaeochromocytomas: does it predict the occurrence of metastases?

Authors:  E van der Harst; H A Bruining; H Jaap Bonjer; F van der Ham; W N Dinjens; S W Lamberts; W W de Herder; J W Koper; T Stijnen; C Proye; M Lecomte-Houcke; F T Bosman; R R de Krijger
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 6.  Pheochromocytomas, PASS, and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  E Carlsen; Z Abdullah; S M B Kazmi; G Kousparos
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.936

7.  Novel and evolving therapies in the treatment of malignant phaeochromocytoma: experience with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001).

Authors:  M R Druce; G A Kaltsas; M Fraenkel; D J Gross; A B Grossman
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.936

8.  Rationalization of genetic testing in patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma.

Authors:  A Cascón; E López-Jiménez; I Landa; S Leskelä; L J Leandro-García; A Maliszewska; R Letón; L de la Vega; M J García-Barcina; C Sanabria; C Alvarez-Escolá; C Rodríguez-Antona; M Robledo
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.936

9.  The value of plasma markers for the clinical behaviour of phaeochromocytomas.

Authors:  E van der Harst; W W de Herder; R R de Krijger; H A Bruining; H J Bonjer; S W J Lamberts; A H van den Meiracker; T H Stijnen; F Boomsma
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 10.  Malignant pheochromocytoma: current status and initiatives for future progress.

Authors:  Graeme Eisenhofer; Stefan R Bornstein; Frederieke M Brouwers; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Patricia L Dahia; Ronald R de Krijger; Thomas J Giordano; Lloyd A Greene; David S Goldstein; Hendrik Lehnert; William M Manger; John M Maris; Hartmut P H Neumann; Karel Pacak; Barry L Shulkin; David I Smith; Arthur S Tischler; William F Young
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.678

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: understanding the complexities of the genetic background.

Authors:  Lauren Fishbein; Katherine L Nathanson
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

2.  No evidence for increased mortality in SDHD variant carriers compared with the general population.

Authors:  Leonie T van Hulsteijn; Berdine Heesterman; Jeroen C Jansen; Jean-Pierre Bayley; Frederik J Hes; Eleonora P M Corssmit; Olaf M Dekkers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Giant cystic pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Kris Miguel Cajipe; Gabriela Gonzalez; Dharam Kaushik
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 4.  Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: assessment of malignant potential.

Authors:  Tim I M Korevaar; Ashley B Grossman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Diagnostic tests and biomarkers for pheochromocytoma and extra-adrenal paraganglioma: from routine laboratory methods to disease stratification.

Authors:  Graeme Eisenhofer; Arthur S Tischler; Ronald R de Krijger
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.943

6.  Clinical presentation of Von Hippel Lindau syndrome type 2B associated with VHL p.A149S mutation in a large Turkish family.

Authors:  T Mete; D Berker; E Yilmaz; G Ozgen; Y Yalcin; M Tuna; D Ciliz; M Onen; Y Aydin; S Guler
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  The systems of metastatic potential prediction in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Minghao Li; Hao Deng; Yingxian Pang; Longfei Liu; Xiao Guan
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 8.  [Grading of neuroendocrine tumors].

Authors:  W Saeger; P A Schnabel; P Komminoth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Current Consensus on I-131 MIBG Therapy.

Authors:  Daiki Kayano; Seigo Kinuya
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-03

Review 10.  Challenges in Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas: from Histology to Molecular Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  C Christofer Juhlin
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.943

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.