BACKGROUND: Matrix coils are based on Gugliemi detachable coils (GDC) but are covered with polyglycolic/polylactic acid. We present our experience regarding the immediate posttreatment results of aneurysm embolization using the 2 coil systems. PATIENTS: We embolized 219 aneurysms in 187 patients with the use of GDCs and 145 aneurysms in 120 patients with the use of Matrix coils. Age, sex distribution, unruptured aneurysm cases, and multiple aneurysm cases were similar in the 2 groups. The percentage of patients in severe clinical condition was significantly higher in the Matrix group. The mean aneurysm size was slightly larger in the GDC group but the mean neck size was larger in the Matrix group. RESULTS: Satisfactory occlusion (at least 90%) was achieved in 95.9% of GDC-treated aneurysms and in 98.6% of Matrix-treated aneurysms. Procedure-related complications occurred in 19.6% of GDC procedures and in 15.6% of the Matrix ones resulting in procedure-related mortality and morbidity of 3.7% and 2.7% for the GDC group and 2.5% and 1.7% for the Matrix group. In the GDC group, outcome was good (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) in 92.6% of patients with unruptured aneurysms, in 82.6% of patients with Hunt and Hess grade I-III, and in 20.5% of those with Hunt and Hess grade of IV-V. The respective figures were 95%, 85.7%, and 22.7% in the Matrix group. CONCLUSION: In our series, Matrix coils have yielded slightly better results regarding satisfactory occlusion rate and clinical outcome but these differences are not statistically significant and probably reflect our increased experience in aneurysm embolization during the period we used Matrix coils.
BACKGROUND: Matrix coils are based on Gugliemi detachable coils (GDC) but are covered with polyglycolic/polylactic acid. We present our experience regarding the immediate posttreatment results of aneurysm embolization using the 2 coil systems. PATIENTS: We embolized 219 aneurysms in 187 patients with the use of GDCs and 145 aneurysms in 120 patients with the use of Matrix coils. Age, sex distribution, unruptured aneurysm cases, and multiple aneurysm cases were similar in the 2 groups. The percentage of patients in severe clinical condition was significantly higher in the Matrix group. The mean aneurysm size was slightly larger in the GDC group but the mean neck size was larger in the Matrix group. RESULTS: Satisfactory occlusion (at least 90%) was achieved in 95.9% of GDC-treated aneurysms and in 98.6% of Matrix-treated aneurysms. Procedure-related complications occurred in 19.6% of GDC procedures and in 15.6% of the Matrix ones resulting in procedure-related mortality and morbidity of 3.7% and 2.7% for the GDC group and 2.5% and 1.7% for the Matrix group. In the GDC group, outcome was good (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) in 92.6% of patients with unruptured aneurysms, in 82.6% of patients with Hunt and Hess grade I-III, and in 20.5% of those with Hunt and Hess grade of IV-V. The respective figures were 95%, 85.7%, and 22.7% in the Matrix group. CONCLUSION: In our series, Matrix coils have yielded slightly better results regarding satisfactory occlusion rate and clinical outcome but these differences are not statistically significant and probably reflect our increased experience in aneurysm embolization during the period we used Matrix coils.
Authors: Andrew Molyneux; Richard Kerr; Irene Stratton; Peter Sandercock; Mike Clarke; Julia Shrimpton; Rury Holman Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-10-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sophie Gallas; Anne Pasco; Jean-Philippe Cottier; Jean Gabrillargues; Jacques Drouineau; Christophe Cognard; Denis Herbreteau Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nestor Gonzalez; Yuichi Murayama; Yih Lin Nien; Neil Martin; John Frazee; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; Y Pierre Gobin; Fernando Viñuela Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: C G McDougall; S Claiborne Johnston; A Gholkar; S L Barnwell; J C Vazquez Suarez; J Massó Romero; J C Chaloupka; A Bonafe; A K Wakhloo; D Tampieri; C F Dowd; A J Fox; S J Imm; K Carroll; A S Turk Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jacques Sedat; Yves Chau; Lydiane Mondot; Richard Chemla; Michel Lonjon; Bernard Padovani Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: C Roth; T Struffert; I Q Grunwald; B F M Romeike; C Krick; P Papanagiotou; P Krampe; W Reith Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 2.804