Literature DB >> 17032484

Coping with ovarian cancer risk: the moderating effects of perceived control on coping and adjustment.

Carolyn Y Fang1, Mary B Daly, Suzanne M Miller, Tana Zerr, John Malick, Paul Engstrom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although perceived control and coping have been studied across various health conditions, these relationships have been less well studied in the context of coping with cancer risk over time. The present study was a longitudinal study of the effects of perceived control and problem-focused coping on changes in psychological adjustment and behavioural outcomes among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighty women enrolled in a familial cancer risk assessment programme participated in this study. Assessments of problem-focused coping, perceived control and distress were collected upon entry into the programme and again at 3-month follow-up. Behavioural adherence to screening during the 12-month period following programme entry was obtained from clinic records.
RESULTS: Using hierarchical regression analysis, we observed a significant interaction between perceived control and problem-focused coping for psychological distress, beta=0.94, p<.05. Specifically, problem-focused coping was associated with increasing distress over time among women who perceived high control. A significant control by coping interaction was also observed for behavioural adherence to pelvic ultrasound and CA125 screening, such that women who perceived high control and utilized problem-focused coping were less likely to undergo screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of high perceived control, problem-focused coping was associated with increasing distress as well as poorer behavioural adherence. Thus, perceived control and problem-focused coping may not always yield positive psychological or behavioural health outcomes. These findings contribute to a greater understanding of how problem-focused coping and perceived control may influence the course of adjustment to cancer risk over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032484     DOI: 10.1348/135910705X60517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  7 in total

1.  Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Barbara France; Gethin Griffith; Gethin Griffin; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Cancer patients' preferences for control at the end of life.

Authors:  Deborah L Volker; Hung-Lan Wu
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-07-06

3.  [Coping and depression in underage children of cancer patients: Data on the course].

Authors:  J Ernst; K von Klitzing; E Brähler; G Romer; H Götze
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Maternal perspectives on the return of genetic results: context matters.

Authors:  Kimberley D Lakes; Elaine Vaughan; Amy Lemke; Marissa Jones; Timothy Wigal; Dean Baker; James M Swanson; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Changes in coping moderate substance abuse outcomes differentially across behavioral treatment modality.

Authors:  Laura E Kuper; Robert Gallop; Shelly F Greenfield
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2010-09-23

Review 6.  Interventions to improve psychosocial well-being in female BRCA-mutation carriers following risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Lisa Jeffers; Joanne Reid; Donna Fitzsimons; Patrick J Morrison; Martin Dempster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-09

7.  Anxiety and depression and cognitive coping strategies and health locus of control in patients with ovary and uterus cancer during anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Marta Kulpa; Urszula Ziętalewicz; Mariola Kosowicz; Beata Stypuła-Ciuba; Patrycja Ziółkowska
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2016-06-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.