| Literature DB >> 17032442 |
Liselotte Aristimuño1, Raimond Armengol, Alberto Cebollada, Mercedes España, Alexis Guilarte, Carmen Lafoz, María A Lezcano, María J Revillo, Carlos Martín, Carmen Ramírez, Nalin Rastogi, Janet Rojas, Albina Vázques de Salas, Christophe Sola, Sofía Samper.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains has become a valuable tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis (TB) by allowing detection of outbreaks, tracking of epidemics, identification of genotypes and transmission events among patients who would have remained undetected by conventional contact investigation. This is the first genetic biodiversity study of M. tuberculosis in Venezuela. Thus, we investigated the genetic patterns of strains isolated in the first survey of anti-tuberculosis drug-resistance realised as part of the Global Project of Anti-tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance (WHO/IUATLD).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17032442 PMCID: PMC1621067 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-90
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Prevalence of M. tuberculosis drug resistance in Venezuela, 1998–1999.
| Total number of cultures | 769 (88) | 104 (12) | 873(100) |
| Susceptible to all drugs | 711(92.5) | 72 (69.2) | 783(90) |
| Resistant to one or more drugs | 58 (7.5) | 32(30.8) | 90(10.3) |
| Resistant to only one drug | 38(4.9) | 12(1.5) | 50(5.7) |
| H | 13(1.7) | 6(5.8) | 19(2.1) |
| R | 3(0.4) | 3(2.9) | 6(0.6) |
| E | 1(0.1) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.1) |
| S | 21(2.7) | 3(2.9) | 24(2.7) |
| MDR (Multidrug resistance) | 4(0.5) | 14(13.5) | 18(2.1) |
| H+R | 2(0.3) | 4(3.8) | 6(0.7) |
| H+R+S | 1(0.1) | 5(4.8) | 6(0.6) |
| H+R+E | 0(0.0) | 2(1.9) | 2(0.2) |
| H+R+E+S | 1(0.1) | 3(2.9) | 4(0.4) |
| Other patherns | 16(2.1) | 6(5.8) | 22(2.5) |
| H+E | 2(0.3) | 1(1.0) | 3(0.3) |
| H+S | 10(1.3) | 3(2.9) | 13(1.5) |
| E+S | 2(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.2) |
| R+E | 1(0.1) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.1) |
| H+E+S | 1(0.1) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.1) |
| R+E+S | 0(0.0) | 2(1.9) | 2(0.2) |
Never treated patients
Total H resistance: 30/769 × 100 = 4%
Total R resistance: 8/769 × 100 = 1%
Total E resistance: 8/769 × 100 = 0.9%
Total S resistance: 36/769 × 100 = 0.7%
Total MDR resistance: 4/769 × 100 = 0.5%
Previously treated patients
Total H resistance: 24/104 = 23%
Total R resistance: 19/104 = 18.3%
Total E resistance: 8/104 × 100 = 7.7%
Total S resistance: 16/104 × 100 = 15.3%
Total MDR resistance: 14/104 = 13.5%
Results of the first survey of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in Venezuela during 1998–1999.
Resistance to drugs: Isoniazid (H), Rifampicin (R), Ethambutol (E), Streptomycin (S) in never treated and previously treated patients.
Figure 1Distribution and number of isolates studied by spoligotyping in 23 provinces from Venezuela.
Description of the M. tuberculosis clusters found in Venezuela.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 17 | 122 | 21.94 | LAM-2 | Ubiquitous | |
| 42 | 66 | 15.47 | LAM-9 | Ubiquitous | |
| 93 | 70 | 12.59 | LAM-5 | Ubiquitous | |
| 53 | 26 | 4.6S | T-1 | Ubiquitous | |
| 20 | 26 | 4.63 | LAM-1 | Ubiquitous | |
| 605 | 18 | 3.24 | U | Loc (VEN/USA) | |
| 1691 | 14 | 2.52 | LAM-2 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 60 | 13 | 2.39 | LAM-4 | Ubiquitous | |
| 905 | 10 | 1.60 | U | Loc (VEN-USA-ARG) | |
| 118 | 9 | 1.61 | T-2 | Ubiquitous | |
| 50 | 9 | 1.61 | H-3 | Ubiquitous | |
| 51 | 8 | 1.43 | T-1 | Ubiquitous | |
| 333 | 7 | 1.25 | LAM-5 | Loc (GUP-GUF-HTI-VEN) | |
| 960 | 5 | 0.90 | U | Loc (VEN-USA) | |
| 34 | 5 | 0.90 | S | Ubiquitous | |
| 194 | 5 | 0.90 | LAM-4 | Loc (USA-BRA-MEX-VEN) | |
| 1696 | 5 | 0.90 | LAM-5 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 47 | 5 | 0.90 | H-1 | Ubiquitous | |
| 130 | 4 | 0.71 | LAM-3 | Ubiquitous | |
| 150 | 4 | 0.71 | LAM-9 | Ubiquitous | |
| 397 | 4 | 0.71 | U | Loc (ITA-BRA-ARG-USA-VEN) | |
| 1692 | 4 | 0.71 | U | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1700 | 4 | 0.71 | T-1 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 33 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-3 | Ubiquitous | |
| 44 | 3 | 0.54 | T-4 | Ubiquitous | |
| 58 | 3 | 0.54 | T-5 | Ubiquitous | |
| 64 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-6 | Ubiquitous | |
| 162 | 3 | 0.54 | U | Loc (ARG-VEN-USA-FIN-FXX-ITA) | |
| 376 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-3 | Loc (VEN-USA) | |
| 578 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-9 | Loc (USA-VEN) | |
| 1698 | 3 | 0.54 | U | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1701 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-9 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1702 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-5 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1705 | 3 | 0.54 | T-1 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1713 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-1 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1718 | 3 | 0.54 | LAM-9 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 52 | 2 | 0.36 | T-2 | Ubiquitous | |
| 62 | 2 | 0.36 | H-1 | Ubiquitous | |
| 71 | 2 | 0.36 | S | Ubiquitous | |
| 106 | 2 | 0.36 | U | Loc (CUB-ECU-M EX-USA-VEN) | |
| 132 | 2 | 0.36 | U | Loc (ESP-AUS-BRA-VEN) | |
| 167 | 2 | 0.36 | T | Ubiquitous | |
| 178 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-4 | Loc (CUB-SEN-VEN) | |
| 196 | 2 | 0.36 | T-1 | Ubiquitous | |
| 386 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-9 | Ubiquitous | |
| 389 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-1 | Loc (BRA-PRT-FIN-VEN) | |
| 430 | 2 | 0.36 | T-4 | Loc (USA-VEN) | |
| 1166 | 2 | 0.36 | T-1 | Ubiquitous (MWI-USA-VEN) | |
| 1661 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-2 | Loc (VEN-BRA) | |
| 1693 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-5 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1699 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-9 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1703 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-9 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1704 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-5 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1707 | 2 | 0.36 | T-1 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1711 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-2 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1714 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-9 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1715 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-4 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1716 | 2 | 0.36 | T-3 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1719 | 2 | 0.36 | LAM-2 | Endemic (VEN) | |
| 1694 | 1 | 0.18 | LAM-5 | Loc (VEN-USA)-Cluster inter-region | |
| 1695 | 1 | 0.18 | LAM-2 | Loc (VEN-BRA)-Cluster inter-region | |
| 1697 | 1 | 0.18 | LAM-9 | Loc (VEN-FXX)-Cluster inter-region | |
| 1706 | 1 | 0.18 | LAM-9 | Loc (VEN-USA)-Cluster inter-region | |
| 1708 | 1 | 0.18 | LAM-9 | Loc (VEN-LVA)-Cluster inter-region | |
| 1709 | 1 | 0.18 | LAM-5 | Loc (VEN-USA)-Cluster inter-region | |
| 1710 | 1 | 0.18 | LAM-4 | Loc (VEN-NLD)-CIuster inter-region | |
| 1717 | 1 | 0.18 | X-1 | Loc (VEN-AUS)-Cluster inter-region | |
| Total | 556 | 100 | |||
1SIT, designation of the spoligotype in the international database [19]. 2n: Number of strains. 3Clade: defined mainly as described [20, 21] LAM: Latin American and Mediterranean, H: Haarlem, T (ill-defined T clade), S: S clade, X: X clade, U: Undesignated. 4C-1: qualifier that tentatively defines an SIT as Endemic, Loc: localized or ubiquitous, as defined in Filliol et al. [20]. Geographic distribution: VEN: Venezuela, USA: United States of America, BRA: Brazil, GUP: Guadeloupe, GUF: French Guiana, HTI: Haiti, ESP: Spain, ECU: Ecuador, ARG: Argentina, CUB: Cuba, MEX: Mexico, SEN: Senegal, PRT: Portugal, FIN: Finland, ITA: Italy, MWI: Malawi, FXX: Metropolitan France, LVA: Latvia, NLD: The Netherlands, AUS: Australia.
Figure 2Genetic network of spoligotypes detected in Venezuela using parsimony principles and the Biolayout software. Each black arrow represents a phylogenetic link between two spoligotypes differing by a genetic change. The size of the circles representing the spoligotypes is proportional to the number of isolates in each cluster. Prevalent phylogenetic clades in Venezuela: LAM (2-9-5); T-1; Haarlem (H-1) and S are named. See text for details.
Figure 3IS. Dendogram based on the Spoligotyping method of 14 MDR strains showing the IS6110 RFLP, the codon 315 in katG gene (0: No Ser315Thr mutation, 1: Ser315Thr) and rpoB gene mutations (1: No mutation, 6: Asp516Val/GAC-GTC, 10: Ser531Leu/TCG-TTG). Strain: identification of the isolate. State: origin of the isolate. SIT: spoligo-international type number [19].