Literature DB >> 1703240

Predicting radionuclide bone scan findings in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen is superior to all other clinical parameters.

F M Chybowski1, J J Keller, E J Bergstralh, J E Oesterling.   

Abstract

Presently, the standard staging evaluation of prostate cancer includes digital rectal examination, measurement of serum tumor markers and a radionuclide bone scan. To evaluate the ability of local clinical stage, tumor grade, serum acid phosphatase, serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) to predict bone scan findings, a retrospective review of 521 randomly chosen patients (mean age 70 years, range 44 to 92 years) with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer was performed. Local clinical stage, tumor grade, acid phosphatase, PAP and PSA all correlated positively with bone scan findings (p less than 0.0001). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, however, PSA had the best over-all correlation with bone scan results. The median serum PSA concentration in patients with a positive bone scan was 158.0 ng./ml., whereas men with a negative bone scan had a median serum PSA level of 11.3 ng./ml. (p less than 0.0001). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, local clinical stage, tumor grade, acid phosphatase and PAP were evaluated in combination with PSA to assess whether these parameters increased the ability of PSA alone to predict bone scan findings. None of these clinical parameters, irrespective of the combination used, contributed appreciably to the predictive power of PSA alone. A probability plot with 95% confidence intervals was constructed that allows the practicing urologist to estimate on an individual basis the probability of a positive bone scan for any given serum PSA value. The most significant finding of this study, however, was the negative predictive value of a low serum PSA concentration for bone scan findings. In 306 men with a serum PSA level of 20 ng./ml. or less only 1 (PSA 18.2 ng./ml.) had a positive bone scan (negative predictive value 99.7%). This finding would suggest that a staging radionuclide bone scan in a previously untreated prostate cancer patient with a low serum PSA concentration may not be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1703240     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38325-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  41 in total

1.  [Radionuclide bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clinical aspects and cost analysis].

Authors:  T Klatte; D Klatte; M Böhm; E P Allhoff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Nuclear medicine.

Authors:  P J Ell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  H Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

Review 4.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  The value of multimodality imaging in the investigation of a PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the Irish hospital setting.

Authors:  L C McLoughlin; S Inder; D Moran; C O'Rourke; R P Manecksha; T H Lynch
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Scintigraphic changes in bone metastasis from prostate cancer after hormonal therapy--comparison with tumor markers and bone X-ray.

Authors:  K Koizumi; G Uchiyama; H Komatsu
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  The clinical value of prostate-specific antigen and bone scintigraphy in the staging of patients with newly diagnosed, pathologically proven prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Rudoni; G Antonini; M Favro; A Baroli; M Brambilla; G Cardani; L Ciardi; G M Sacchetti; E Inglese
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-03

8.  Utility of SPECT imaging for determination of vertebral metastases in patients with known primary tumors.

Authors:  D L Bushnell; D Kahn; B Huston; C G Bevering
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Coagulopathy in the prostate cancer patient: prevalence and clinical relevance.

Authors:  A S Adamson; J L Francis; R O Witherow; M E Snell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  [(11)C]choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic therapy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Elisa Coradeschi; Vincenzo Scattoni; Valentino Bettinardi; Cesare Cozzarini; Massimo Freschi; Ferruccio Fazio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.