Literature DB >> 17031778

[Psychiatric expert opinion in case of early retirement--how reliable?].

J R M Dickmann1, A Broocks.   

Abstract

The study provides first data on reliability of expert psychiatric opinion under regulations of the German state run pension scheme. 22 experienced psychiatrists judged very heterogeneously on a hypothetical case suffering from recurrent depression of moderate severity. Diagnosis according to ICD-10 led to six different diagnoses. 32 % produced the most probable ICD-10 diagnosis, 86 % a second diagnosis and 32 % a third. In their final socio-medical verdict eight experts found an early retirement on medical grounds to be unjustified, four experts thought the insured member incapable of working at all and ten believed she was able to work 4-6 hours a day. Contrary to wide held believes concerning "lax" psychiatric experts our sample revealed the experts to be "tough". This high variability of expert opinions is, however, unacceptable for members of the German state-run pensions schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17031778     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr        ISSN: 0720-4299            Impact factor:   0.752


  7 in total

1.  [Negative response bias and assessment of uncooperativeness in independent medical evaluations].

Authors:  T Merten
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Evaluation of work disability and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: what to expect and what not.

Authors:  Jessica Anner; Urban Schwegler; Regina Kunz; Bruno Trezzini; Wout de Boer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Use of a structured functional evaluation process for independent medical evaluations of claimants presenting with disabling mental illness: rationale and design for a multi-center reliability study.

Authors:  Monica Bachmann; Wout de Boer; Stefan Schandelmaier; Andrea Leibold; Renato Marelli; Joerg Jeger; Ulrike Hoffmann-Richter; Ralph Mager; Heinz Schaad; Thomas Zumbrunn; Nicole Vogel; Oskar Bänziger; Jason W Busse; Katrin Fischer; Regina Kunz
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.

Authors:  Jürgen Barth; Wout E L de Boer; Jason W Busse; Jan L Hoving; Sarah Kedzia; Rachel Couban; Katrin Fischer; David Y von Allmen; Jerry Spanjer; Regina Kunz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-01-25

5.  Online Survey of Medical and Psychological Professionals on Structured Instruments for the Assessment of Work Ability in Psychiatric Patients.

Authors:  Roman Schleifer; Alex Gamma; Ingeborg Warnke; Mounira Jabat; Wulf Rössler; Michael Liebrenz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire.

Authors:  Regine Lohss; Timm Rosburg; Monica Bachmann; Brigitte Walter Meyer; Wout de Boer; Katrin Fischer; Regina Kunz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Requirements for an electronic handover system for interprofessional collaboration between psychotherapists and occupational health professionals - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Fiona Kohl; Peter Angerer; Lisa Guthardt; Jeannette Weber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.908

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.