BACKGROUND: For a small subset of patients, laparoscopic fundoplication fails, typically resulting in recurrent reflux or severe dysphagia. Although redo fundoplications can be performed laparoscopically, few studies have examined their long-term efficacy. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, the authors identified and contacted 41 patients who had undergone redo laparoscopic fundoplications at the University of Washington between 1996 and 2001. The median follow-up period was 50 months (range, 20-95 months). Current symptoms were compared with those acquired and entered into the authors' database preoperatively. Patients also were asked to return for esophageal manometry and pH testing. RESULTS: All redo fundoplications were performed laparoscopically. There were no conversions. The most common indication for redo fundoplication was recurrent reflux. The most common anatomic abnormality was a herniated wrap. Heartburn improved in 61%, regurgitation in 69%, and dysphagia in 74% of the patients. Complete resolution of these symptoms was achieved, respectively, in 45%, 41% and 38% of these same patients. Overall, 68% of the patients rated the success of the procedure as either "excellent" or "good," and 78% said they were happy they chose to have it. For those who underwent reoperation for gastroesophageal reflux disease, distal esophageal acid exposure according to 24-h pH monitoring decreased after redo fundoplication from 15.7% +/- 18.1% to 3.4% +/- 3.6% (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Although not as successful as primary fundoplication, a majority of patients can expect durable improvement in their symptoms with a laparoscopic redo fundoplication.
BACKGROUND: For a small subset of patients, laparoscopic fundoplication fails, typically resulting in recurrent reflux or severe dysphagia. Although redo fundoplications can be performed laparoscopically, few studies have examined their long-term efficacy. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, the authors identified and contacted 41 patients who had undergone redo laparoscopic fundoplications at the University of Washington between 1996 and 2001. The median follow-up period was 50 months (range, 20-95 months). Current symptoms were compared with those acquired and entered into the authors' database preoperatively. Patients also were asked to return for esophageal manometry and pH testing. RESULTS: All redo fundoplications were performed laparoscopically. There were no conversions. The most common indication for redo fundoplication was recurrent reflux. The most common anatomic abnormality was a herniated wrap. Heartburn improved in 61%, regurgitation in 69%, and dysphagia in 74% of the patients. Complete resolution of these symptoms was achieved, respectively, in 45%, 41% and 38% of these same patients. Overall, 68% of the patients rated the success of the procedure as either "excellent" or "good," and 78% said they were happy they chose to have it. For those who underwent reoperation for gastroesophageal reflux disease, distal esophageal acid exposure according to 24-h pH monitoring decreased after redo fundoplication from 15.7% +/- 18.1% to 3.4% +/- 3.6% (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Although not as successful as primary fundoplication, a majority of patients can expect durable improvement in their symptoms with a laparoscopic redo fundoplication.
Authors: L Lundell; P Miettinen; H E Myrvold; S A Pedersen; B Liedman; J G Hatlebakk; R Julkonen; K Levander; J Carlsson; M Lamm; I Wiklund Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Julio C U Coelho; Carolina G Gonçalves; Christiano M P Claus; Paulo C Andrigueto; Matheus N Ribeiro Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 1.719
Authors: Yashodhan S Khajanchee; Robert W O'Rourke; Barbara Lockhart; Emma J Patterson; Paul D Hansen; Lee L Swanstrom Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2002-09
Authors: Mehran Anvari; Christopher Allen; John Marshall; David Armstrong; Ron Goeree; Wendy Ungar; Charles Goldsmith Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; Geoffrey P Kohn; Patrick R Reardon; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sarah C McKay; Christy M Dunst; Ahmed M Sharata; Reid Fletcher; Kevin M Reavis; Daniel Davila Bradley; Steven R DeMeester; Dolores Müller; Brett Parker; Lee L Swanström Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Al-Warith Al Hashmi; Guillaume Pineton de Chambrun; Regis Souche; Martin Bertrand; Vito De Blasi; Eric Jacques; Santiago Azagra; Jean Michel Fabre; Frédéric Borie; Michel Prudhomme; Nicolas Nagot; Francis Navarro; Fabrizio Panaro Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kathleen M Coakley; Steven A Groene; Paul D Colavita; Tanushree Prasad; Dimitris Stefanidis; Amy E Lincourt; Vedra A Augenstein; Keith Gersin; B Todd Heniford Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: D von Renteln; I Schiefke; K H Fuchs; S Raczynski; M Philipper; W Breithaupt; K Caca; H Neuhaus Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; Tallal M Zeni; John G Zografakis; Ronald M Moore; Mick Meiselman; Minh Luu; Georgios D Ayiomamitis Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 1.878