BACKGROUND: During successful chemotherapy of osteosarcomas tumour size does not diminish significantly because the therapy has limited impact on the mineralized matrix of the tumour. Treatment response is considered successful if, histologically, more than 90% of tumour cells show necrosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine if osteosarcomas change their water diffusion during preoperative chemotherapy in relation to the amount of tumour necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients (age 11-19 years) with histologically proven limb osteosarcoma underwent T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo imaging together with diffusion-weighted EPI sequences (b = 700) at 1.5 T before and after five cycles of standard chemotherapy. Tumour volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated before and after chemotherapy. The degree of tumour necrosis after chemotherapy was assessed using the histological Salzer-Kuntschik classification (grades 1-6). RESULTS: During chemotherapy, the ADC values of osteosarcomas changed significantly. The ADC of untreated tumour was 2.1 +/- 0.4 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (mean +/- SD) (95% CI 1.6-2.0). The ADC of chemotherapy-treated sarcomas was 2.5 +/- 0.4 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (95% CI 1.8-2.2). Necrotic areas, which were confirmed by macroscopic examination, showed ADC values up to 2.7 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Four patients with little viable tumour tissue within the neoplasm (Salzer-Kuntschik grades 1-2) had an increase in ADC of 0.4 up to 0.7 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Four patients with larger areas of viable tumour (Salzer-Kuntschik grade 4) showed a lesser increase in ADC of 0.0 up to 0.3 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. The differences in ADC values in tumour tissue before and after chemotherapy were highly significant (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: During chemotherapy of osteosarcomas, tumour ADC changes are related to the degree of tumour necrosis.
BACKGROUND: During successful chemotherapy of osteosarcomas tumour size does not diminish significantly because the therapy has limited impact on the mineralized matrix of the tumour. Treatment response is considered successful if, histologically, more than 90% of tumour cells show necrosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine if osteosarcomas change their water diffusion during preoperative chemotherapy in relation to the amount of tumour necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients (age 11-19 years) with histologically proven limb osteosarcoma underwent T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo imaging together with diffusion-weighted EPI sequences (b = 700) at 1.5 T before and after five cycles of standard chemotherapy. Tumour volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated before and after chemotherapy. The degree of tumour necrosis after chemotherapy was assessed using the histological Salzer-Kuntschik classification (grades 1-6). RESULTS: During chemotherapy, the ADC values of osteosarcomas changed significantly. The ADC of untreated tumour was 2.1 +/- 0.4 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (mean +/- SD) (95% CI 1.6-2.0). The ADC of chemotherapy-treated sarcomas was 2.5 +/- 0.4 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (95% CI 1.8-2.2). Necrotic areas, which were confirmed by macroscopic examination, showed ADC values up to 2.7 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Four patients with little viable tumour tissue within the neoplasm (Salzer-Kuntschik grades 1-2) had an increase in ADC of 0.4 up to 0.7 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Four patients with larger areas of viable tumour (Salzer-Kuntschik grade 4) showed a lesser increase in ADC of 0.0 up to 0.3 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. The differences in ADC values in tumour tissue before and after chemotherapy were highly significant (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: During chemotherapy of osteosarcomas, tumour ADC changes are related to the degree of tumour necrosis.
Authors: F A Hoffer; A Y Nikanorov; W E Reddick; S M Bodner; X Xiong; D Jones-Wallace; S A Gronemeyer; B N Rao; W M Kauffman; T Laor Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2000-05
Authors: Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer; Feng Chen; Yicheng Ni; Willy Landuyt; Eric K Verbeken; Hilde Bosmans; Guy Marchal; Robert Hermans Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer; Vincent Vandecaveye; Feng Chen; Xihe Sun; Hilde Bosmans; Robert Hermans; Eric K Verbeken; Chris Boesch; Guy Marchal; Willy Landuyt; Yicheng Ni Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-09-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jie Deng; Frank H Miller; Thomas K Rhee; Kent T Sato; Mary F Mulcahy; Laura M Kulik; Riad Salem; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: C Baunin; G Schmidt; K Baumstarck; C Bouvier; J C Gentet; A Aschero; A Ruocco; B Bourlière; G Gorincour; C Desvignes; N Colavolpe; G Bollini; P Auqier; P Petit Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 2.199