Literature DB >> 15734932

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in monitoring the effect of a vascular targeting agent on rhabdomyosarcoma in rats.

Harriet C Thoeny1, Frederik De Keyzer, Feng Chen, Yicheng Ni, Willy Landuyt, Eric K Verbeken, Hilde Bosmans, Guy Marchal, Robert Hermans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for monitoring tumor response in rats after administration of combretastatin A4 phosphate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study protocol was approved by local ethical committee for animal care and use. Rhabdomyosarcomas implanted subcutaneously in both flanks of 17 rats were evaluated with 1.5-T MR unit by using four-channel wrist coil. Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences before and after gadodiamide administration, and transverse echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR examinations were performed before, 1 and 6 hours, and 2 and 9 days after intraperitoneal injection of vascular targeting agent (combretastatin A4 phosphate, 25 mg/kg). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was automatically calculated from diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings. These findings were compared with histopathologic results at each time point. For statistical analysis, paired Student t tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing were used.
RESULTS: T1-weighted images before combretastatin administration showed enhancement of solid tumor tissue but not of central necrosis. At 1 and 6 hours after combretastatin injection, enhancement of solid tissue disappeared almost completely, with exception of small peripheral rim. At 2 and 9 days after combretastatin injection, enhancement progressively reappeared in tumor periphery. ADC, however, showed decrease early after combretastatin injection ([1.26 +/- 0.16]x 10(-3) mm2/sec before, [1.18 +/- 0.17]x 10(-3) mm2/sec 1 hour after [P=.0005] and [1.08 +/- 0.14]x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec 6 hours after [P=.0007] combretastatin A4 phosphate injection), histologically corresponding to vessel congestion and vascular shutdown in periphery but no necrosis. An increase of ADC ([1.79 +/- 0.13]x 10(-3) mm2/sec) (P <.0001) 2 days after combretastatin A4 phosphate injection was paralleled by progressive histologic necrosis. A significant (P <.0001) decrease in ADC 9 days after treatment ([1.41 +/- 0.15]x 10(-3) mm2/sec) corresponded to tumor regrowth.
CONCLUSION: In addition to basic relaxation-weighted MR imaging and postgadolinium T1-weighted MR imaging to enable prompt detection of vascular shutdown, diffusion-weighted MR imaging was used to discriminate between nonperfused but viable and necrotic tumor tissues for early monitoring of therapeutic effects of vascular targeting agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734932     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2343031721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  46 in total

1.  Response of HT29 colorectal xenograft model to cediranib assessed with 18 F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Louisa Bokacheva; Khushali Kotedia; Megan Reese; Sally-Ann Ricketts; Jane Halliday; Carl H Le; Jason A Koutcher; Sean Carlin
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 3.  Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Multiparametric MRI biomarkers for measuring vascular disrupting effect on cancer.

Authors:  Huaijun Wang; Guy Marchal; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28

5.  Value of diffusion-weighted images in differentiating mid-course responders to chemotherapy for osteosarcoma compared to the histological response: preliminary results.

Authors:  C Baunin; G Schmidt; K Baumstarck; C Bouvier; J C Gentet; A Aschero; A Ruocco; B Bourlière; G Gorincour; C Desvignes; N Colavolpe; G Bollini; P Auqier; P Petit
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows noninvasive in vivo monitoring of the effects of combretastatin a-4 phosphate after repeated administration.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer; Feng Chen; Vincent Vandecaveye; Erik K Verbeken; Bisan Ahmed; Xihe Sun; Yicheng Ni; Hilde Bosmans; Robert Hermans; Allan van Oosterom; Guy Marchal; Willy Landuyt
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Drug Development.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 8.  Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Michael A Jacobs; Xin Wang; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Shuji Nagata; Hiroshi Nishimura; Masafumi Uchida; Jun Sakoda; Tatsuyuki Tonan; Kouji Hiraoka; Kensei Nagata; Jun Akiba; Toshi Abe; Naofumi Hayabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-07-27

10.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Guoying Liu; Dow Mu Koh; Thomas L Chenevert; Harriet C Thoeny; Taro Takahara; Andrew Dzik-Jurasz; Brian D Ross; Marc Van Cauteren; David Collins; Dima A Hammoud; Gordon J S Rustin; Bachir Taouli; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.