Literature DB >> 17021915

Honeybees learn floral odors while receiving nectar from foragers within the hive.

Walter M Farina1, Christoph Grüter, Luis Acosta, Sofía Mc Cabe.   

Abstract

Recent studies showed that nectar odors brought back by honeybee foragers can be learned associatively inside the hive. In the present study, we focused on the learning abilities of bees, which directly interact via trophallaxis with the incoming nectar foragers: the workers that perform nectar-receiving tasks inside the hive. Workers that have received food directly from foragers coming back from a feeder offering either unscented or scented sugar solution [phenylacetaldehyde (PHE) or nonanal diluted] were captured from two observational hives, and their olfactory memories were tested using the proboscis extension response paradigm. Bees that have received scented solution from incoming foragers showed significantly increased response frequencies for the corresponding solution odor in comparison with those that have received unscented solution. No differences in the response frequencies were found between food odors and colonies. The results indicate that first-order receivers learn via trophallaxis the association between the scent and the sugar solution transferred by incoming foragers. The implications of these results should be considered at three levels: the operational cohesion of bees involved in foraging-related tasks, the information propagation inside the hive related to the floral type exploited, and the putative effect of these memories on future preferences for resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17021915     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-006-0157-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  9 in total

Review 1.  Memory processes in classical conditioning.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Erik W Moody
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  How long will honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) be stimulated by scent to revisit past-profitable forage sites?

Authors:  Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Non-random nectar unloading interactions between foragers and their receivers in the honeybee hive.

Authors:  Joaquín Goyret; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-28

4.  A relationship between conditioning and communication in honey bees.

Authors:  D L Johnson; A M Wenner
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1966 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive.

Authors:  Walter M Farina; Christoph Grüter; Paula C Díaz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Rodrigo J De Marco
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  M E Bitterman; R Menzel; A Fietz; S Schäfer
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Honey bee recruitment to food sources: olfaction or language?

Authors:  A M Wenner; P H Wells; D L Johnson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Perceptual and neural olfactory similarity in honeybees.

Authors:  Fernando Guerrieri; Marco Schubert; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total
  35 in total

1.  Floral odor learning within the hive affects honeybees' foraging decisions.

Authors:  Andrés Arenas; Vanesa M Fernández; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-11-21

2.  Stingless bees (Scaptotrigona pectoralis) learn foreign trail pheromones and use them to find food.

Authors:  Christian Reichle; Ingrid Aguilar; Manfred Ayasse; Stefan Jarau
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Recruits of the stingless bee Scaptotrigona pectoralis learn food odors from the nest atmosphere.

Authors:  Christian Reichle; Stefan Jarau; Ingrid Aguilar; Manfred Ayasse
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-04-01

4.  Social transmission of information about a mutualist via trophallaxis in ant colonies.

Authors:  Masayuki Hayashi; Masaru K Hojo; Masashi Nomura; Kazuki Tsuji
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Honey bee workers generate low-frequency vibrations that are reliable indicators of their activity level.

Authors:  Michael Hrncir; Camila Maia-Silva; Walter M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  The neuroethology of olfactory sex communication in the honeybee Apis mellifera L.

Authors:  Julia Mariette; Julie Carcaud; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Learning at old age: a study on winter bees.

Authors:  Andreas Behrends; Ricarda Scheiner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  The influence of gustatory and olfactory experiences on responsiveness to reward in the honeybee.

Authors:  Gabriela P Ramírez; Andrés S Martínez; Vanesa M Fernández; Gonzalo Corti Bielsa; Walter M Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Associative learning during early adulthood enhances later memory retention in honeybees.

Authors:  Andrés Arenas; Vanesa M Fernández; Walter M Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.