Literature DB >> 30465281

Honey bee workers generate low-frequency vibrations that are reliable indicators of their activity level.

Michael Hrncir1, Camila Maia-Silva2, Walter M Farina3,4.   

Abstract

In social insects, the tuning of activity levels among different worker task groups, which constitutes a fundamental basis of colony organization, relies on the exchange of reliable information on the activity level of individuals. The underlying stimuli, however, have remained largely unexplored so far. In the present study, we describe low-frequency thoracic vibrations generated by honey bee workers (Apis mellifera) within the colony, whose velocity amplitudes and main frequency components significantly increased with the level of an individual's activity. The characteristics of these vibrations segregated three main activity level-groups: foragers, active hive bees, and inactive hive bees. Nectar foragers, moreover, modulated their low-frequency vibrations during trophallactic food unloading to nestmates according to the quality of the collected food. Owing to their clear association with the activity level of an individual and their potential perceptibility during direct contacts, these low-frequency thoracic vibrations are candidate stimuli for providing unambiguous local information on the motivational status of honey bee workers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; Mechanical cues; Motivational state; Social insects; Vibratory communication

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30465281     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-018-1305-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  22 in total

1.  Task group differences in cuticular lipids in the honey bee Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Ricarda Kather; Falko P Drijfhout; Stephen J Martin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Inter-caste communication in social insects.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Self-organization in social insects.

Authors:  E Bonabeau; G Theraulaz; J L Deneubourg; S Aron; S Camazine
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Honey bee forager thoracic temperature inside the nest is tuned to broad-scale differences in recruitment motivation.

Authors:  Nik Sadler; James C Nieh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  How do bees shiver?

Authors:  H Esch; F Goller; B Heinrich
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-03-10

6.  Responsiveness to sucrose affects tactile and olfactory learning in preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains.

Authors:  R Scheiner; R E Page; J Erber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-04-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Vibrating the food receivers: a direct way of signal transmission in stingless bees (Melipona seminigra).

Authors:  Michael Hrncir; Veronika M Schmidt; Dirk Louis P Schorkopf; Stefan Jarau; Ronaldo Zucchi; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms.

Authors:  Brian R Johnson
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Changes in the thoracic temperature of honeybees while receiving nectar from foragers collecting at different reward rates.

Authors:  W M Farina; A J Wainselboim
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Transmission of vibration across honeycombs and its detection by bee leg receptors

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.