Literature DB >> 16133104

Non-random nectar unloading interactions between foragers and their receivers in the honeybee hive.

Joaquín Goyret1, Walter M Farina.   

Abstract

Nectar acquisition in the honeybee Apis mellifera is a partitioned task in which foragers gather nectar and bring it to the hive, where nest mates unload via trophallaxis (i.e. mouth-to-mouth transfer) the collected food for further storage. Because forager mates exploit different feeding places simultaneously, this study addresses the question of whether nectar unloading interactions between foragers and hive-bees are established randomly, as it is commonly assumed. Two groups of foragers were trained to exploit a different scented food source for 5 days. We recorded their trophallaxes with hive-mates, marking the latter ones according to the forager group they were unloading. We found non-random probabilities for the occurrence of trophallaxes between experimental foragers and hive-bees, instead, we found that trophallactic interactions were more likely to involve groups of individuals which had formerly interacted orally. We propose that olfactory cues present in the transferred nectar promoted the observed bias, and we discuss this bias in the context of the organization of nectar acquisition: a partitioned task carried out in a decentralized insect society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16133104     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-005-0016-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  10 in total

1.  Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. I. Effect of Colony Size on Queueing Delay and Colony Ergonomic Efficiency.

Authors:  Carl Anderson; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The defence of the honeybee community.

Authors:  C R RIBBANDS
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1954-09-27

3.  A relationship between conditioning and communication in honey bees.

Authors:  D L Johnson; A M Wenner
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1966 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Communication among honey bees with field experience.

Authors:  D L Johnson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. II. Use of Queueing Delay Information in Recruitment.

Authors:  Francis L W Ratnieks; Carl Anderson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive.

Authors:  Walter M Farina; Christoph Grüter; Paula C Díaz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Floral scents induce recall of navigational and visual memories in honeybees.

Authors:  Judith Reinhard; Mandyam V Srinivasan; David Guez; Shaowu W Zhang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Rodrigo J De Marco
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Crop scents affect the occurrence of trophallaxis among forager honeybees.

Authors:  M Gil; W M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Partial nectar loads as a cause of multiple nectar transfer in the honey bee (Apis mellifera): a simulation model.

Authors:  Andrew M Gregson; Adam G Hart; Michael Holcombe; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  How does mobility help distributed systems compute?

Authors:  William F Vining; Fernando Esponda; Melanie E Moses; Stephanie Forrest
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Honeybees learn floral odors while receiving nectar from foragers within the hive.

Authors:  Walter M Farina; Christoph Grüter; Luis Acosta; Sofía Mc Cabe
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-10-05

3.  The influence of gustatory and olfactory experiences on responsiveness to reward in the honeybee.

Authors:  Gabriela P Ramírez; Andrés S Martínez; Vanesa M Fernández; Gonzalo Corti Bielsa; Walter M Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; M Sol Balbuena; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Volatile exposure within the honeybee hive and its effect on olfactory discrimination.

Authors:  Vanesa M Fernández; Andrés Arenas; Walter M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Divergent rules for pollen and nectar foraging bumblebees--a laboratory study with artificial flowers offering diluted nectar substitute and pollen surrogate.

Authors:  Sabine Konzmann; Klaus Lunau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Sublethal Doses of Imidacloprid on Young Adult Honeybee Behaviour.

Authors:  Carolina Mengoni Goñalons; Walter Marcelo Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bumble bee parasite strains vary in resistance to phytochemicals.

Authors:  Evan C Palmer-Young; Ben M Sadd; Philip C Stevenson; Rebecca E Irwin; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evolution of resistance to single and combined floral phytochemicals by a bumble bee parasite.

Authors:  E C Palmer-Young; B M Sadd; L S Adler
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Odor Experiences during Preimaginal Stages Cause Behavioral and Neural Plasticity in Adult Honeybees.

Authors:  Gabriela Ramírez; Carol Fagundez; Juan P Grosso; Pablo Argibay; Andrés Arenas; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.