Literature DB >> 17020901

The use of the Newcastle Control Score in the management of intermittent exotropia.

Deborah Buck1, Sarah R Hatt, Helen Haggerty, Susan Hrisos, Nicholas P Strong, Nicholas I Steen, Michael P Clarke.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the use of the Newcastle Control Score (NCS) in the management of intermittent exotropia (X(T)). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Children aged <11 years with X(T) had an assessment of NCS as part of routine management. Other data collected included visual acuity, near and distance alignment with alternating prism cover test and near (Frisby test) and distance stereoacuity (Frisby Davis Distance Stereotest (FD2TM)). Analysis involved correlation between baseline NCS, angle and stereoacuity, examination of change over time and logistic regression to determine predictors of surgery.
RESULTS: Baseline data were obtained on 272 children and follow-up data on 157. Mean (SD) age was 4 (1.9) years. Complete NCSs were obtained for all except one child at baseline, and all children at follow-up. At baseline, total NCS and the home control component were correlated with near stereo (r = -0.22, p<0.01 and r = -0.19, p<0.02, respectively), near alignment (r = 0.34, p<0.001 and r = 0.19, p<0.02) and distance alignment (r = 0.30, p<0.001 and r = 0.26, p<0.001). The clinic near control component was correlated with near alignment (r = 0.39, p<0.001), but not near stereoacuity, and the clinic distance control with near alignment (r = 0.16, p<0.02), distance alignment (r = 0.27, p<0.001) and distance stereoacuity (r = -0.25, p<0.03). A high (poor) NCS (> or =4) at the latest follow-up predicted surgery (p<0.001, OR 29.3, 95% CI 6.2 to 138.7).
CONCLUSION: The NCS is a useful measure of the clinical severity of X(T), can be used to serially assess improvement or deterioration and is a useful tool for the management of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17020901      PMCID: PMC1857598          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.097790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for intermittent distance exotropia: review.

Authors:  L Gnanaraj; S R Richardson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Binocularity and photophobia in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  E C Campos; C Cipolli
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1992-06

3.  The course of intermittent exotropia in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Kevin J Nusz; Brian G Mohney; Nancy N Diehl
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Timely surgery in intermittent and constant exotropia for superior sensory outcome.

Authors:  A D Abroms; B G Mohney; D P Rush; M M Parks; P Y Tong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Intermittent exotropia, overcorrecting minus lenses, and the Newcastle scoring system.

Authors:  Patrick Watts; Emma Tippings; Hasan Al-Madfai
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  A retrospective review of 287 consecutive children in singapore presenting with intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Audrey Chia; Linley Seenyen; Quah Boon Long
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Intermittent exotropia. Surgical results in different age groups.

Authors:  J M Richard; M M Parks
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The Newcastle Control Score: a new method of grading the severity of intermittent distance exotropia.

Authors:  H Haggerty; S Richardson; S Hrisos; N P Strong; M P Clarke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

  8 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Binocular Summation and Control of Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  Fatma Yulek; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Joseph L Demer; Stacy L Pineles
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2017-05-08

3.  Associations between health-related quality of life and the decision to perform surgery for childhood intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Brian G Mohney; Michael C Brodsky; Tomohiko Yamada; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Variability of stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; Brian G Mohney; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Overcorrecting minus lens therapy in patients with intermittent exotropia: Should it be the first therapeutic choice?

Authors:  Huseyin Bayramlar; Ayse Y Gurturk; Unsal Sari; Remzi Karadag
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort.

Authors:  Deborah Buck; Christine J Powell; Jugnoo Rahi; Phillippa Cumberland; Peter Tiffin; Robert Taylor; John Sloper; Helen Davis; Emma Dawson; Michael P Clarke
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Stereoacuity with Frisby and revised FD2 stereo tests.

Authors:  Iwo Bohr; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Intermittent exotropia: Surgical treatment strategies.

Authors:  Jai Aditya Kelkar; Santhan Gopal; Rachana B Shah; Aditya S Kelkar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  The Natural Course of Intermittent Exotropia over a 3-year Period and the Factors Predicting the Control Deterioration.

Authors:  Jeremy J S W Kwok; Gabriela S L Chong; Simon T C Ko; Jason C S Yam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.