Literature DB >> 17016744

Comparison of intracranial pressure measured simultaneously within the brain parenchyma and cerebral ventricles.

A Brean1, P K Eide, Audun Stubhaug.   

Abstract

We report a 48-year-old man treated for acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) wherein intracranial pressure (ICP) was measured simultaneously within the ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the brain parenchyma (PAR). Single pressure waves within the continuous pressure signal were identified with determination of the single wave parameters pulse amplitude (i.e. pressure difference between diastolic minimum pressure and systolic maximum pressure), mean pressure (i.e. mean pressure from beginning to ending minimum diastolic minimum pressure), and latency (i.e. rise time from diastolic minimum pressure to systolic maximum pressure). A total of 218,589 CSF/PAR single pressure wave pairs were analyzed. For these CSF/PAR wave pairs the mean difference in pulse pressure amplitude was -0.13 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to -0.12 mmHg], mean difference in mean single wave pressure -0.71 mmHg (95% CI -0.74 to -0.68 mmHg), and mean difference in latency -0.01 seconds (95% CI -0.01 to -0.01 seconds). Hence, in this patient monitoring ICP within the ventricular CSF or brain parenchyma gave similar results. Moreover, the comparisons of single CSF/PAR wave pulse pressure amplitudes gave no evidence of a pressure gradient from brain parenchyma to the ventricular CSF in this patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016744     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-006-9047-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  6 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of intracranial pressure.

Authors:  D J Doyle; P W Mark
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-01

2.  There is no transmantle pressure gradient in communicating or noncommunicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Hannes Stephensen; Magnus Tisell; Carsten Wikkelsö
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Comparison of simultaneous continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) signals from a Codman and a Camino ICP sensor.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  A new method for processing of continuous intracranial pressure signals.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Assessment of quality of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in children.

Authors:  P K Eide
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.162

Review 6.  Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure.

Authors:  M Czosnyka; J D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.154

  6 in total
  13 in total

1.  An evaluation and comparison of intraventricular, intraparenchymal, and fluid-coupled techniques for intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John Vender; Jennifer Waller; Krishnan Dhandapani; Dennis McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ROLE OF INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE PULSATIONS AND SMALL GRADIENTS IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF HYDROCEPHALUS.

Authors:  Kathleen P Wilkie; Corina S Drapaca; Sivabal Sivaloganathan
Journal:  Int J Numer Anal Model B       Date:  2012

3.  Optimizing accuracy of freehand cannulation of the ipsilateral ventricle for intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with brain trauma.

Authors:  Zhongyi Sun; Lin Wu; Zhixiong Liu; Weiming Zhong; Zhifeng Kou; Jinfang Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-11

4.  Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting.

Authors:  Per K Eide; Are Brean
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2010-02-12

5.  Evaluation of a New Catheter for Simultaneous Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Cerebral Spinal Fluid Drainage: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Xiuyun Liu; Lara L Zimmermann; Nhi Ho; Paul Vespa; Xiaoling Liao; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility.

Authors:  Mark E Wagshul; Per K Eide; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2011-01-18

7.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods-A Review.

Authors:  P H Raboel; J Bartek; M Andresen; B M Bellander; B Romner
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-08

8.  Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: New challenges in health and disease.

Authors:  Conrad E Johanson; John A Duncan; Petra M Klinge; Thomas Brinker; Edward G Stopa; Gerald D Silverberg
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2008-05-14

Review 9.  Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Usmah Kawoos; Richard M McCarron; Charles R Auker; Mikulas Chavko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Comparison of parenchymal and ventricular intracranial pressure readings utilizing a novel multi-parameter intracranial access system.

Authors:  Tracey Berlin; Cristina Murray-Krezan; Howard Yonas
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.