Literature DB >> 11904027

There is no transmantle pressure gradient in communicating or noncommunicating hydrocephalus.

Hannes Stephensen1, Magnus Tisell, Carsten Wikkelsö.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a transmantle pressure gradient exists in adult patients with communicating and noncommunicating hydrocephalus.
METHODS: Ten patients participated in the study. The mean patient age was 57 +/- 18 years (range, 20-80 yr); seven patients had communicating hydrocephalus, and three had noncommunicating hydrocephalus. Microsensors were used to measure the intracranial pressure (ICP), for 17 to 24 hours during sleeping and waking periods, in the right lateral ventricle (ICP(IV)) and in the subarachnoid space (ICP(SAS)) over the right cerebral convexity simultaneously. Patient activities and body positions were documented. The hydrostatic pressure difference between the two sensors was calculated from cranial x-rays for four basic body positions and compared with the actual body positions of the patients and the measured difference between the two sensors. For three 10-minute periods, the exact transmantle pressure gradient was calculated for each patient as ICP(IV) - ICP(SAS), adjusted for the hydrostatic pressure difference.
RESULTS: The measured pressure difference between the two sensors was always within the limits of the maximal possible hydrostatic pressure difference, and it correlated well with the expected difference for the various body positions: mean correlation coefficient, 0.79 +/- 0.10 (range, 0.65-0.92). The exact mean transmantle pressure was -0.01 +/- 0.24 mmHg (range, -0.4 to 0.4 mmHg). ICP waves caused by cardiac pulse, respiration, and B waves were identical in both spaces.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates no factual support for existence of a transmantle pressure gradient in nonacute communicating or noncommunicating hydrocephalus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11904027     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200204000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  26 in total

1.  [Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Flow measurement of cerebrospinal fluid using phase contrast MRI and its diagnostics importance].

Authors:  F T Al-Zain; G Rademacher; J Lemcke; J Mutze; U Meier
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Development of an acute obstructive hydrocephalus model in rats using N-butyl cyanoacrylate.

Authors:  Yong Sook Park; Seung Won Park; Jong Sik Suk; Taik Kyun Nam
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Objective B wave analysis in 55 patients with non-communicating and communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  H Stephensen; N Andersson; A Eklund; J Malm; M Tisell; C Wikkelsö
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Updated physiology and pathophysiology of CSF circulation--the pulsatile vector theory.

Authors:  M Preuss; K-T Hoffmann; M Reiss-Zimmermann; W Hirsch; A Merkenschlager; J Meixensberger; M Dengl
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Hydrocephalus decreases arterial spin-labeled cerebral perfusion.

Authors:  K W Yeom; R M Lober; A Alexander; S H Cheshier; M S B Edwards
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Comparison of intracranial pressure measured simultaneously within the brain parenchyma and cerebral ventricles.

Authors:  A Brean; P K Eide; Audun Stubhaug
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Hearing loss in hydrocephalus: a review, with focus on mechanisms.

Authors:  David Satzer; Daniel J Guillaume
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Elevated CSF outflow resistance associated with impaired lymphatic CSF absorption in a rat model of kaolin-induced communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Gurjit Nagra; Mark E Wagshul; Shams Rashid; Jie Li; J Pat McAllister; Miles Johnston
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2010-02-10

9.  The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics?

Authors:  G A Bateman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  MR assessment of pediatric hydrocephalus: a road map.

Authors:  Charles Raybaud
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.