Literature DB >> 16253539

Comparison of simultaneous continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) signals from a Codman and a Camino ICP sensor.

Per Kristian Eide1.   

Abstract

Simultaneous continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) signals from two different sensors were compared. Continuous ICP monitoring from two ICP sensors (i.e. Codman ICP MicroSensor; Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, MA and Camino OLM ICP; Camino Laboratories, San Diego, CA) placed within the brain parenchyma was performed in three patients within the intensive care unit (ICU) as part of routine management of severe subarachnoid hemorrhage. For each 6s time window mean ICP was computed, showing large differences in mean ICP values between the signals. Differences above 5 mmHg were observed in 13% of the 128,425 time windows derived from 214 h ICP recordings in these three patients. In one patient, mean ICP differed more than 10 mmHg in 23% of the time windows. Comparisons of 675,503 individual single pressure wave pairs of these 128,425 time windows revealed marginal differences in single wave amplitude (dP, i.e. pulse pressure) and latency (dT, i.e. rise time) values, suggesting that differences in mean ICP were caused by differences in baseline pressure. For the individual time windows were computed the mean wave amplitude and mean wave latency values according to a new algorithm. There were as well marginal differences between signals of mean wave amplitude and latency values. Thus, changes in baseline pressure affect mean ICP but not single pressure wave characteristics such as amplitude (dP) and (dT) latency values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253539     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  14 in total

1.  An evaluation and comparison of intraventricular, intraparenchymal, and fluid-coupled techniques for intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John Vender; Jennifer Waller; Krishnan Dhandapani; Dennis McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Comparison of intracranial pressure measured simultaneously within the brain parenchyma and cerebral ventricles.

Authors:  A Brean; P K Eide; Audun Stubhaug
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting.

Authors:  Per K Eide; Are Brean
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2010-02-12

4.  A dynamic nonlinear relationship between the static and pulsatile components of intracranial pressure in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Per K Eide; Benjamin I Rapoport; William B Gormley; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  The baseline pressure of intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors can be altered by electrostatic discharges.

Authors:  Per K Eide; André Bakken
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: New challenges in health and disease.

Authors:  Conrad E Johanson; John A Duncan; Petra M Klinge; Thomas Brinker; Edward G Stopa; Gerald D Silverberg
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2008-05-14

7.  An intracranial pressure-derived index monitored simultaneously from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Simultaneous monitoring of static and dynamic intracranial pressure parameters from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Sverre Holm; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Baseline pressure errors (BPEs) extensively influence intracranial pressure scores: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  The effect of baseline pressure errors on an intracranial pressure-derived index: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.