Literature DB >> 17014375

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation dissociates working memory manipulation from retention functions in the prefrontal, but not posterior parietal, cortex.

Bradley R Postle1, Fabio Ferrarelli, Massihullah Hamidi, Eva Feredoes, Marcello Massimini, Michael Peterson, Andrew Alexander, Giulio Tononi.   

Abstract

Understanding the contributions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to working memory is central to understanding the neural bases of high-level cognition. One question that remains controversial is whether the same areas of the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) that participate in the manipulation of information in working memory also contribute to its short-term retention (STR). We evaluated this question by first identifying, with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), brain areas involved in manipulation. Next, these areas were targeted with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) while subjects performed tasks requiring only the STR or the STR plus manipulation of information in working memory. fMRI indicated that manipulation-related activity was independent of retention-related activity in both the PFC and superior parietal lobule (SPL). rTMS, however, yielded a different pattern of results. Although rTMS of the dlPFC selectively disrupted manipulation, rTMS of the SPL disrupted manipulation and STR to the same extent. rTMS of the postcentral gyrus (a control region) had no effect on performance. The implications of these results are twofold. In the PFC, they are consistent with the view that this region contributes more importantly to the control of information in working memory than to its STR. In the SPL, they illustrate the importance of supplementing the fundamentally correlational data from neuroimaging with a disruptive method, which affords stronger inference about structure-function relations.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17014375     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  56 in total

1.  Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Klaartje Heinen; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Christian Ruff; Jon Driver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of brain activity during the transition from visually guided to memory-guided force control.

Authors:  Cynthia Poon; Lisa G Chin-Cottongim; Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory.

Authors:  Aron K Barbey; Michael Koenigs; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information.

Authors:  Eun-Young Lee; Nelson Cowan; Edward K Vogel; Terry Rolan; Fernando Valle-Inclán; Steven A Hackley
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Constrained principal component analysis reveals functionally connected load-dependent networks involved in multiple stages of working memory.

Authors:  Paul Metzak; Eva Feredoes; Yoshio Takane; Liang Wang; Sara Weinstein; Tara Cairo; Elton T C Ngan; Todd S Woodward
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Multiple concurrent thoughts: The meaning and developmental neuropsychology of working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Localization of load sensitivity of working memory storage: quantitatively and qualitatively discrepant results yielded by single-subject and group-averaged approaches to fMRI group analysis.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

9.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, working memory and episodic memory processes: insight through transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques.

Authors:  Michela Balconi
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.203

10.  Evaluating frontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Massihullah Hamidi; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.