Literature DB >> 17011849

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.

Lorenz Barleon1, Esther M Hoffmann, Manfred Berres, Norbert Pfeiffer, Franz H Grus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained by dynamic contour tonometry PASCAL (DCT-PASCAL) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma eyes and healthy eyes with different central corneal thickness (CCT).
DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: In a randomized order, three consecutive IOP measurements were performed on 197 eyes of 107 subjects by one examiner using both DCT-PASCAL and GAT on all eyes. Furthermore, ultrasonic pachymetry was performed. The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) was determined to compare IOP readings between DCT-PASCAL and GAT. Regression-based Bland and Altman analysis was used to evaluate agreement between the instruments.
RESULTS: Mean IOP values obtained by both instruments were significantly correlated in healthy and glaucoma eyes (all healthy eyes [n = 66]: r = 0.8, P < .001, all glaucoma eyes [n = 131]: r = 0.96, P < .001). Neither GAT nor DCT-PASCAL showed a significant correlation with CCT (GAT: all eyes: r = 0.009, P = .9, DCT-PASCAL: all eyes: r = -0.05, P = .5). Bland and Altman analysis revealed the existence of proportional bias. Thus, 95% limits of agreement between the instruments varied with the actual IOP measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: DCT-PASCAL and GAT revealed a strong correlation in IOP measurements between glaucoma and healthy eyes. However, the analysis of agreement indicated some discrepancies between the instruments. Measurements with both GAT and DCT-PASCAL were not correlated with central corneal thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17011849     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  25 in total

1.  The influence of soft contact lenses on the intraocular pressure measurement.

Authors:  P G Firat; C Cankaya; S Doganay; M Cavdar; S Duman; E Ozsoy; B Koc
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Diurnal variations of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in dogs from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm.

Authors:  Eva Martín-Suárez; Carolina Molleda; Rodrigo Tardón; Alba Galán; José Gallardo; José Molleda
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 3.  [Measuring intraocular pressure by different methods].

Authors:  J Lamparter; E M Hoffmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiro Mawatari; Akira Kobayashi; Hideaki Yokogawa; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  [Differentiation of ocular hypertension].

Authors:  E M Hoffmann; J Lamparter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP.

Authors:  Chungkwon Yoo; Young Sub Eom; Yong Yeon Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J Jimenez-Roman; F Gil-Carrasco; A Martinez; O Albis-Donado; J D De la Torre-Tovar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Tony Realini; Robert N Weinreb; Gerald Hobbs
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  Jong-Hyun Oh; Chungkwon Yoo; Yong Yeon Kim; Hyo-Myung Kim; Jong-Suk Song
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.