Literature DB >> 17010890

The development of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Richard G Fessler1, John E O'Toole, Kurt M Eichholz, Mick J Perez-Cruet.   

Abstract

The modern era of minimally invasive spine surgery has its roots in percutaneous techniques developed in the mid-twentieth century. The widespread application of minimally invasive techniques seen today is predicated on technologic developments of only the past 10 years, however. This article reviews the development of minimally invasive spinal surgery as it has evolved for the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Each new development has sought to equal or improve on the effectiveness demonstrated by comparable open surgical techniques while reducing iatrogenic tissue trauma and resultant postoperative pain and disability, to produce overall better outcomes for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17010890     DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2006.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am        ISSN: 1042-3680            Impact factor:   2.509


  23 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

Review 2.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Visceral, vascular, and wound complications following over 13,000 lateral interbody fusions: a survey study and literature review.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Armen R Deukmedjian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Indications for deformity correction with minimally invasive spondylodesis].

Authors:  C Wimmer; T Pfandlsteiner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Operative treatment of scoliosis : Preoperative planning, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative management].

Authors:  C Wimmer; A E Siam; T Pfandlsteiner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Minimally invasive iliac screw fixation in treating painful metastatic lumbosacral deformity: a technique description and clinical results.

Authors:  Gabriel Liu; Muhammed Yaser Hasan; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Less invasive approaches for the treatment of cervical schwannomas: our experience.

Authors:  S Raysi Dehcordi; S Marzi; A Ricci; F Di Cola; R J Galzio
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgeon Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Webb; Lionel Gottschalk; Yu-Po Lee; Steven Garfin; Choll Kim
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-09-01

9.  Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws.

Authors:  Saeed S Sadrameli; Ryan Jafrani; Blake N Staub; Majdi Radaideh; Paul J Holman
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

10.  Risk factors predicting less favorable outcomes in endoscopic lumbar discectomies.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Katzell
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.