R Agid1, S K Lee, R A Willinsky, R I Farb, K G terBrugge. 1. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St., Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada. ronit.agid@uhn.on.ca
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical role of CT angiography (CTA) in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) for treatment decision-making. METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute SAH had CTA using a 64-slice scanner for initial clinical decision-making. Image processing included multiplanar volume reformatted (MPVR) maximum intensity projections (MIP) and 3D volume-rendered reconstructions. CTAs were used for (1) evaluating the cause of SAH, and (2) triaging aneurysm-bearing patients to the more appropriate management, either surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. CTA findings were confirmed by neurosurgical exploration or catheter angiography (digital subtraction angiography, DSA). Successful coiling provided evidence that triaging to endovascular treatment was correct. RESULTS: Included in the study were 73 patients. CTA findings were confirmed by DSA or neurosurgical operation in 65 patients, and of these 65, 47 had aneurysmal SAH, 3 had vasculitis, 1 had arterial dissection and 14 had no underlying arterial abnormality. The cause of SAH was detected with CTA in 62 out of the 65 patients (95.4%, sensitivity 94%, specificity 100%). CTA revealed the aneurysm in 46 of 47 patients (98%, sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 82.3%), 1 of 3 vasculitides and 1 of 1 dissection. Of the 46 patients with aneurysm, 44 (95.7%) were referred for treatment based on CTA. In 2 patients (2 of 46, 4.4%) CTA was not informative enough to choose treatment requiring DSA. Of the 44 patients, 27 (61.4%) were referred to endovascular treatment and successful coiling was achieved in 25 (25 of 27, 92.6%). CONCLUSION: CTA using a 64-slice scanner is an accurate tool for detecting and characterizing aneurysms in acute SAH. CTA is useful in the decision process whether to coil or clip an aneurysm.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical role of CT angiography (CTA) in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) for treatment decision-making. METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute SAH had CTA using a 64-slice scanner for initial clinical decision-making. Image processing included multiplanar volume reformatted (MPVR) maximum intensity projections (MIP) and 3D volume-rendered reconstructions. CTAs were used for (1) evaluating the cause of SAH, and (2) triaging aneurysm-bearingpatients to the more appropriate management, either surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. CTA findings were confirmed by neurosurgical exploration or catheter angiography (digital subtraction angiography, DSA). Successful coiling provided evidence that triaging to endovascular treatment was correct. RESULTS: Included in the study were 73 patients. CTA findings were confirmed by DSA or neurosurgical operation in 65 patients, and of these 65, 47 had aneurysmalSAH, 3 had vasculitis, 1 had arterial dissection and 14 had no underlying arterial abnormality. The cause of SAH was detected with CTA in 62 out of the 65 patients (95.4%, sensitivity 94%, specificity 100%). CTA revealed the aneurysm in 46 of 47 patients (98%, sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 82.3%), 1 of 3 vasculitides and 1 of 1 dissection. Of the 46 patients with aneurysm, 44 (95.7%) were referred for treatment based on CTA. In 2 patients (2 of 46, 4.4%) CTA was not informative enough to choose treatment requiring DSA. Of the 44 patients, 27 (61.4%) were referred to endovascular treatment and successful coiling was achieved in 25 (25 of 27, 92.6%). CONCLUSION: CTA using a 64-slice scanner is an accurate tool for detecting and characterizing aneurysms in acute SAH. CTA is useful in the decision process whether to coil or clip an aneurysm.
Authors: G Tipper; J M U-King-Im; S J Price; R A Trivedi; J J Cross; N J Higgins; R Farmer; J Wat; R Kirollos; P J Kirkpatrick; N M Antoun; J H Gillard Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: J Pablo Villablanca; Adina Achiriolaie; Parizad Hooshi; Neil Martin; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; John Frazee; Pierre Gobin; James Sayre; Fernando Viñuela Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: C Kouskouras; A Charitanti; C Giavroglou; N Foroglou; P Selviaridis; V Kontopoulos; A S Dimitriadis Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: B K Velthuis; G J Rinkel; L M Ramos; T D Witkamp; J W Berkelbach van der Sprenkel; W P Vandertop; M S van Leeuwen Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Maria T Karamessini; George C Kagadis; Theodore Petsas; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Dimitrios Konstantinou; George C Sakellaropoulos; George C Nikiforidis; Dimitrios Siablis Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Brian L Hoh; Arnold C Cheung; James D Rabinov; Johnny C Pryor; Bob S Carter; Christopher S Ogilvy Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Mahesh V Jayaraman; William W Mayo-Smith; Glenn A Tung; Richard A Haas; Jeffrey M Rogg; Neerav R Mehta; Curtis E Doberstein Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-12-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R Agid; T Andersson; H Almqvist; R A Willinsky; S-K Lee; K G terBrugge; R I Farb; M Söderman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: B Lubicz; M Levivier; O François; P Thoma; N Sadeghi; L Collignon; D Balériaux Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert D Stevens; Neeraj S Naval; Marek A Mirski; Giuseppe Citerio; Peter J Andrews Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 17.440