Literature DB >> 17009020

Revision surgeries in cochlear implant patients: a review of 45 cases.

Lela Migirov1, Riki Taitelbaum-Swead, Minka Hildesheimer, Jona Kronenberg.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the causes for revision procedures, surgical findings and audiological outcome in reoperated cochlear implant patients. The medical records of 45 patients were reviewed retrospectively for age at the time of implantation, the implant was used for initial and revision surgeries, the duration of implant use before revision, surgical findings, and postoperative audiological results. Generally, children were reoperated more often than adults (12.5 vs. 6.9%) and, with one exception of improper electrode insertion, there were no major post-revision complications. Device failure (DF) was the main cause for revision surgery (23/45) followed by wound/flap problems, magnet/receiver-stimulator displacement, foreign body/allergic reaction, subperiosteal abscess, misplaced electrode, intractable vertigo, cholesteatoma and extrusion of the positioner. No significant difference was found in the rate of DF between children and adults for each implant separately (P = 0.289 for Nucleus 22, P = 0.355 for Nucleus 24, P = 0.683 for Clarion and P = 1.0 for Med-El). The failure rates of different implants did not differed significantly among adults. DF in the Clarion group was significantly higher compared to the Nucleus and Med-El combined for pediatric patients (P = 0.0218) and all CI recipients (adults + children; P = 0.0055). The post-revision audiological benefit was unchanged or improved compared to the initial implantation values in all reimplanted patients and was not influenced by minor surgical procedures (wound revision, drainage of any collection, magnet replacement, or relocation of receiver-stimulator). Since DF was found to be the most common cause for reoperation, improving device technology could prevent the vast majority of revision procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17009020     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0144-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  20 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implant failure: imaging evaluation of the electrode course.

Authors:  R Jain; S K Mukherji
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Different forms of dizziness occurring after cochlear implant.

Authors:  T Kubo; K Yamamoto; T Iwaki; K Doi; M Tamura
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation in children and adults: a review of 342 cases in Vienna.

Authors:  Christoph Arnoldner; Wolf Dieter Baumgartner; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jafar Hamzavi
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Surgical and nonsurgical complications associated with cochlear prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  I M Windmill; S A Martinez; M B Nolph; B A Eisenmenger
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1990-11

5.  Cochlear implant reimplantation.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; M A Svirsky; W A Myres; K I Kirk; J Schulte
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

6.  Magnet displacement following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Lela Migirov; Jona Kronenberg
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Outcome analysis of cochlear implant reimplantation in children.

Authors:  S C Parisier; P M Chute; A L Popp; G D Suh
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Mastoiditis and acute otitis media in children with cochlear implants: recommendations for medical management.

Authors:  H G Kempf; T Stöver; T Lenarz
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

9.  Revision cochlear implant surgery in adult patients with suspected device malfunction.

Authors:  Craig A Buchman; Carol A Higgins; Robert Cullen; Harold C Pillsbury
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Postoperative infection in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Calhoun D Cunningham; William H Slattery; William M Luxford
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cochlear Implant Reliability: On the Reporting of Rates of Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Graham O'Neill; Neil S Tolley
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Foreign body or hypersensitivity granuloma of the inner ear after cochlear implantation: one possible cause of a soft failure?

Authors:  Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington; Barbara J Burgess
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Foreign Body Response to Silicone in Cochlear Implant Electrodes in the Human.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Donald Galler; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Foreign Body Reaction After Cochlear Implantation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yuan Xin; Ya-Sheng Yuan; Fang-Lu Chi; Jing Wang; Juan-Mei Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Cellular immunologic responses to cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Joseph B Nadol; Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Donald Galler
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The effect of pulling out cochlear implant electrodes on inner ear microstructures: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Rainer O Seidl; Arne Ernst
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-11

7.  Complications in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  D C Gheorghe; A Zamfir-Chiru-Anton
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Clinical outcomes of cochlear reimplantation due to device failure.

Authors:  Chong-Sun Kim; Dong-Kyu Kim; Myung-Whan Suh; Seung Ha Oh; Sun O Chang
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Complications requiring cochlear reimplantation.

Authors:  Seied Basir Hashemi; Hajar Bahrani Fard
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012

10.  Electrode Afterload: A Valuable Technique in a Case of Short Electrode Insertion.

Authors:  C Riemann; S Scholz; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.