PURPOSE: Retrospective studies suggest cytogenetic abnormalities detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) can identify patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who will experience a more aggressive disease course. Other studies suggest that patients may acquire chromosome abnormalities during the course of their disease. There are minimal prospective data on the clinical utility of the widely used hierarchical FISH prognostic categories in patients with newly diagnosed early-stage CLL or the frequency of clonal evolution as determined by interphase FISH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2002, we enrolled 159 patients with previously untreated CLL (83% Rai stage 0/I) on a prospective trial evaluating clonal evolution by FISH. Patients provided baseline and follow-up specimens for FISH testing during 2 to 12 years. RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities detected by FISH at study entry predicted overall survival. Eighteen patients experienced clonal evolution during follow-up. The rate of clonal evolution increased with duration of follow-up with only one occurrence in the first 2 years (n = 71; 1.4%) but 17 occurrences (n = 63; 27%) among patients tested after 5+ years. Clonal evolution occurred among 10% of ZAP-70-negative and 42% of ZAP-70-positive patients at 5+ years (P = .008). CONCLUSION: This clinical trial confirms prospectively that cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH can predict overall survival for CLL patients at the time of diagnosis, but also suggests that many patients acquire new abnormalities during the course of their disease. Patients with higher ZAP-70 expression may be more likely to experience such clonal evolution. These findings have important implications for both clinical management and trials of early treatment for patients with high-risk, early-stage CLL.
PURPOSE: Retrospective studies suggest cytogenetic abnormalities detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) can identify patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who will experience a more aggressive disease course. Other studies suggest that patients may acquire chromosome abnormalities during the course of their disease. There are minimal prospective data on the clinical utility of the widely used hierarchical FISH prognostic categories in patients with newly diagnosed early-stage CLL or the frequency of clonal evolution as determined by interphase FISH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2002, we enrolled 159 patients with previously untreated CLL (83% Rai stage 0/I) on a prospective trial evaluating clonal evolution by FISH. Patients provided baseline and follow-up specimens for FISH testing during 2 to 12 years. RESULTS:Chromosomal abnormalities detected by FISH at study entry predicted overall survival. Eighteen patients experienced clonal evolution during follow-up. The rate of clonal evolution increased with duration of follow-up with only one occurrence in the first 2 years (n = 71; 1.4%) but 17 occurrences (n = 63; 27%) among patients tested after 5+ years. Clonal evolution occurred among 10% of ZAP-70-negative and 42% of ZAP-70-positive patients at 5+ years (P = .008). CONCLUSION: This clinical trial confirms prospectively that cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH can predict overall survival for CLL patients at the time of diagnosis, but also suggests that many patients acquire new abnormalities during the course of their disease. Patients with higher ZAP-70 expression may be more likely to experience such clonal evolution. These findings have important implications for both clinical management and trials of early treatment for patients with high-risk, early-stage CLL.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Neil E Kay; Kari G Rabe; David J Inwards; Clive S Zent; Jose F Leis; Susan M Schwager; Carrie A Thompson; Deborah A Bowen; Thomas E Witzig; Susan L Slager; Timothy G Call Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J A Woyach; G Lozanski; A S Ruppert; A Lozanski; K A Blum; J A Jones; J M Flynn; A J Johnson; M R Grever; N A Heerema; J C Byrd Journal: Leukemia Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Shelly R Gunn; Mansoor S Mohammed; Mercedes E Gorre; Philip D Cotter; Jaeweon Kim; David W Bahler; Sergey N Preobrazhensky; Russell A Higgins; Aswani R Bolla; Sahar H Ismail; Daphne de Jong; Eric Eldering; Marinus H J van Oers; Clemens H M Mellink; Michael J Keating; Ellen J Schlette; Lynne V Abruzzo; Ryan S Robetorye Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2008-08-07 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Alessandra Ferrajoli; Tait D Shanafelt; Cristina Ivan; Masayoshi Shimizu; Kari G Rabe; Nazila Nouraee; Mariko Ikuo; Asish K Ghosh; Susan Lerner; Laura Z Rassenti; Lianchun Xiao; Jianhua Hu; James M Reuben; Steliana Calin; M James You; John T Manning; William G Wierda; Zeev Estrov; Susan O'Brien; Thomas J Kipps; Michael J Keating; Neil E Kay; George A Calin Journal: Blood Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jane Houldsworth; Asha Guttapalli; Venkata Thodima; Xiao Jie Yan; Geetu Mendiratta; Tania Zielonka; Gouri Nanjangud; Weiyi Chen; Sujata Patil; Anthony Mato; Jennifer R Brown; Kanti Rai; Nicholas Chiorazzi; R S K Chaganti Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2013-11-12
Authors: Shih-Shih Chen; Mara H Sherman; Erin Hertlein; Amy J Johnson; Michael A Teitell; John C Byrd; Christoph Plass Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2009-11-15 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Peter Ouillette; Samuel Fossum; Brian Parkin; Li Ding; Paula Bockenstedt; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Kerby Shedden; Sami N Malek Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shanique Palmer; Curtis A Hanson; Clive S Zent; Luis F Porrata; Betsy Laplant; Susan M Geyer; Svetomir N Markovic; Timothy G Call; Deborah A Bowen; Diane F Jelinek; Neil E Kay; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 6.998