Literature DB >> 18687794

Whole-genome scanning by array comparative genomic hybridization as a clinical tool for risk assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Shelly R Gunn1, Mansoor S Mohammed, Mercedes E Gorre, Philip D Cotter, Jaeweon Kim, David W Bahler, Sergey N Preobrazhensky, Russell A Higgins, Aswani R Bolla, Sahar H Ismail, Daphne de Jong, Eric Eldering, Marinus H J van Oers, Clemens H M Mellink, Michael J Keating, Ellen J Schlette, Lynne V Abruzzo, Ryan S Robetorye.   

Abstract

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) provides a powerful method for simultaneous genome-wide scanning and prognostic marker assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In the current study, commercially available bacterial artificial chromosome and oligonucleotide array CGH platforms were used to identify chromosomal alterations of prognostic significance in 174 CLL cases. Tumor genomes were initially analyzed by bacterial artificial chromosome array CGH followed by confirmation and breakpoint mapping using oligonucleotide arrays. Genomic changes involving loci currently interrogated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panels were detected in 155 cases (89%) at expected frequencies: 13q14 loss (47%), trisomy 12 (13%), 11q loss (11%), 6q loss (7.5%), and 17p loss (4.6%). Genomic instability was the second most commonly identified alteration of prognostic significance with three or more alterations involving loci not interrogated by FISH panels identified in 37 CLL cases (21%). A subset of 48 CLL cases analyzed by six-probe FISH panels (288 total hybridizations) was concordant with array CGH results for 275 hybridizations (95.5%); 13 hybridizations (4.5%) were discordant because of clonal populations that comprised less than 30% of the sample. Array CGH is a powerful, cost-effective tool for genome-wide risk assessment in the clinical evaluation of CLL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687794      PMCID: PMC2518739          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.080033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  30 in total

1.  Automated array-based genomic profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: development of a clinical tool and discovery of recurrent genomic alterations.

Authors:  Carsten Schwaenen; Michelle Nessling; Swen Wessendorf; Tatjana Salvi; Gunnar Wrobel; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Hans A Kestler; Christian Haslinger; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Hartmut Döhner; Martin Bentz; Peter Lichter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Telomeric IGH losses detectable by fluorescence in situ hybridization in chronic lymphocytic leukemia reflect somatic VH recombination events.

Authors:  Iwona Wlodarska; Christine Matthews; Ellen Veyt; Helena Pospisilova; Mark A Catherwood; Tim S Poulsen; Vera Vanhentenrijk; Rachel Ibbotson; Peter Vandenberghe; T C M Curly Morris; H Denis Alexander
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  High-resolution oligonucleotide array-CGH pinpoints genes involved in cryptic losses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  A Tyybakinoja; J Vilpo; S Knuutila
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 4.  Structural variation in the human genome: the impact of copy number variants on clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Laia Rodriguez-Revenga; Montserrat Mila; Carla Rosenberg; Allen Lamb; Charles Lee
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Clonal evolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: acquisition of high-risk genomic aberrations associated with unmutated VH, resistance to therapy, and short survival.

Authors:  Stephan Stilgenbauer; Sandrine Sander; Lars Bullinger; Axel Benner; Elke Leupolt; Dirk Winkler; Alexander Kröber; Dirk Kienle; Peter Lichter; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Challenges in array comparative genomic hybridization for the analysis of cancer samples.

Authors:  Norma J Nowak; Jeffrey Miecznikowski; Stephen R Moore; Daniel Gaile; Dolores Bobadilla; David D Smith; Kemp Kernstine; Stephen J Forman; Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia; Mary Reid; Daniel Stoler; Thom Loree; Nestor Rigual; Maureen Sullivan; Lawrence M Weiss; David Hicks; Marilyn L Slovak
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Hallek; Bruce D Cheson; Daniel Catovsky; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Hillmen; Michael J Keating; Emili Montserrat; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Novel agents and strategies for treatment of p53-defective chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Michael R Grever; David M Lucas; Amy J Johnson; John C Byrd
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  Genetics and risk-stratified approach to therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Thorsten Zenz; Hartmut Döhner; Stephan Stilgenbauer
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Chromosome 5q deletion: specific diagnoses and cytogenetic details among 358 consecutive cases from a single institution.

Authors:  Rafael Santana-Davila; Shernan G Holtan; Gordon W Dewald; Rhett P Ketterling; Ryan A Knudson; Curtis A Hanson; David P Steensma; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.156

View more
  29 in total

1.  Array comparative genomic hybridization detects chromosomal abnormalities in hematological cancers that are not detected by conventional cytogenetics.

Authors:  Lina Shao; Sung-Hae L Kang; Jian Li; Patricia Hixson; Jesalyn Taylor; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Chad A Shaw; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Chung-Che Chang; Sau Wai Cheung; Ankita Patel
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  TCL1 targeting miR-3676 is codeleted with tumor protein p53 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Veronica Balatti; Lara Rizzotto; Cecelia Miller; Alexey Palamarchuk; Paolo Fadda; Rosantony Pandolfo; Laura Z Rassenti; Erin Hertlein; Amy S Ruppert; Arletta Lozanski; Gerard Lozanski; Thomas J Kipps; John C Byrd; Carlo M Croce; Yuri Pekarsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The vanguard has arrived in the clinical laboratory: array-based karyotyping for prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Shelly R Gunn
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Array-based karyotyping for prognostic assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: performance comparison of Affymetrix 10K2.0, 250K Nsp, and SNP6.0 arrays.

Authors:  Jill M Hagenkord; Federico A Monzon; Shera F Kash; Stan Lilleberg; Qingmei Xie; Jeffrey A Kant
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 5.  Clinical application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the identification of prognostically important genetic alterations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Russell A Higgins; Shelly R Gunn; Ryan S Robetorye
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Array-based genomic screening at diagnosis and during follow-up in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Rebeqa Gunnarsson; Larry Mansouri; Anders Isaksson; Hanna Göransson; Nicola Cahill; Mattias Jansson; Markus Rasmussen; Jeanette Lundin; Stefan Norin; Anne Mette Buhl; Karin Ekström Smedby; Henrik Hjalgrim; Karin Karlsson; Jesper Jurlander; Christian Geisler; Gunnar Juliusson; Richard Rosenquist
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  High fluorescence in situ hybridization percentage of deletion 11q in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia is an independent predictor of adverse outcome.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Michael Keating; Phillip A Thompson; Long Trinh; Xuemei Wang; William Wierda; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Jan Burger; Hagop Kantarjian; Zeev Estrov; Lynne Abruzzo; Susan O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 10.047

8.  Clinical application of targeted and genome-wide technologies: can we predict treatment responses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Authors:  Reem Alsolami; Samantha Jl Knight; Anna Schuh
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis identifies recurrent gain of chromosome 2p25.3 involving the ACP1 and MYCN genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Deqin Ma; Zhao Chen; Keyur P Patel; Bal M Mishra; Hui Yao; Lynne V Abruzzo; L Jeffrey Medeiros; William Wierda; Michael Keating; Rachel Sargent; Rajyalakshmi Luthra
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2011-05-05

10.  Genomic imbalance defines three prognostic groups for risk stratification of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Jane Houldsworth; Asha Guttapalli; Venkata Thodima; Xiao Jie Yan; Geetu Mendiratta; Tania Zielonka; Gouri Nanjangud; Weiyi Chen; Sujata Patil; Anthony Mato; Jennifer R Brown; Kanti Rai; Nicholas Chiorazzi; R S K Chaganti
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.