Literature DB >> 17006734

Assessment of the continence status and patients' satisfaction after retropubic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based study.

Oktay Demirkesen1, Bulent Onal, Burcin Tunc, Bulent Alici, Ali Ulvi Onder, Ali Ugur Ozalp, Bulent Cetinel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the continence status and patients' satisfaction after retropubic radical prostatectomy by a self-administered questionnaire composed of 12 questions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 143 patients who underwent RRP operation at our department from 1992 to 2000 with a minimum 6 months of follow-up were assessed. Seventy two patients participated in the study. The continence status was classified as follows; patients who did not leak were considered as "continent", those who had leakage that occurred less frequent than or equal to once a day were regarded as "socially continent", and those who had more than once a day leakage were regarded as "incontinent". The correlation between urinary leakage, patients' satisfaction and pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative factors were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done using Fisher's exact, chi-square, Student's-t and logistic regression tests.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients at surgery was 63.9 years (49-76) with a follow-up period of 37.1 months (6-97). Of these patients, 44% were continent, 48% were socially continent, 8% were incontinent. A total of 64 of 72 patients (89%) were satisfied with their final continence status, and 63 (87%) patients accepted to undergo the same surgery again if it is indicated. Pre-, peri- and post-operative factors did not influence the urinary leakage rates. Patients with nocturnal leakage, urgency, decreased urinary flow and patients who use pad (-s) were significantly less satisfied on univariate analysis, while only nocturnal leakage had a significant impact on patients' satisfaction on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Urinary leakage and patients' satisfaction rates after RRP were 56% and 89%, respectively. None of the factors could predict the post-operative continence status. When evaluating the patients' satisfaction, only nocturnal leakage was found to have an adverse affect on multivariate analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17006734     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-006-9067-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

1.  Early post-prostatectomy pelvic floor biofeedback.

Authors:  J J Franke; W B Gilbert; J Grier; M O Koch; Y Shyr; J A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Nonresponse bias in a survey of patient perceptions of hospital care.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger; Eric Chamot; Patrick A Bovier
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study.

Authors:  A Groutz; J G Blaivas; D C Chaikin; J P Weiss; M Verhaaren
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J A Talcott; P Rieker; K J Propert; J A Clark; K I Wishnow; K R Loughlin; J P Richie; P W Kantoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-08-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and quality of life. Experience with 620 consecutive cases.

Authors:  P Leandri; G Rossignol; J R Gautier; J Ramon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988-1990 (updated June 1993).

Authors:  F J Fowler; M J Barry; G Lu-Yao; A Roman; J Wasson; J E Wennberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Effect of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on patient quality of life: results from a Medicare survey.

Authors:  F J Fowler; M J Barry; G Lu-Yao; J Wasson; A Roman; J Wennberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence.

Authors:  M S Steiner; R A Morton; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Recovery of urinary function after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical perineal prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Mohammad Jafri; Laura N Nguyen; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.