Literature DB >> 17005621

Computational motor control: redundancy and invariance.

Emmanuel Guigon1, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget.   

Abstract

The nervous system controls the behavior of complex kinematically redundant biomechanical systems. How it computes appropriate commands to generate movements is unknown. Here we propose a model based on the assumption that the nervous system: 1) processes static (e.g., gravitational) and dynamic (e.g., inertial) forces separately; 2) calculates appropriate dynamic controls to master the dynamic forces and progress toward the goal according to principles of optimal feedback control; 3) uses the size of the dynamic commands (effort) as an optimality criterion; and 4) can specify movement duration from a given level of effort. The model was used to control kinematic chains with 2, 4, and 7 degrees of freedom [planar shoulder/elbow, three-dimensional (3D) shoulder/elbow, 3D shoulder/elbow/wrist] actuated by pairs of antagonist muscles. The muscles were modeled as second-order nonlinear filters and received the dynamics commands as inputs. Simulations showed that the model can quantitatively reproduce characteristic features of pointing and grasping movements in 3D space, i.e., trajectory, velocity profile, and final posture. Furthermore, it accounted for amplitude/duration scaling and kinematic invariance for distance and load. These results suggest that motor control could be explained in terms of a limited set of computational principles.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005621     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00290.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  Two classes of movements in motor control.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Passive motion paradigm: an alternative to optimal control.

Authors:  Vishwanathan Mohan; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Short-Duration and Intensive Training Improves Long-Term Reaching Performance in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Hyeshin Park; Sujin Kim; Carolee J Winstein; James Gordon; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Optimality, stochasticity, and variability in motor behavior.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guigon; Pierre Baraduc; Michel Desmurget
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Energy margins in dynamic object manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Tian Shen; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Yupeng Xiao; Sujin Kim; Toshinori Yoshioka; James Gordon; Rieko Osu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Influence of workspace constraints on directional preferences of 3D arm movements.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  New symmetry of intended curved reaches.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Redundancy, self-motion, and motor control.

Authors:  V Martin; J P Scholz; G Schöner
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.