Risa Sawaki1, Jun'ichi Katayama. 1. Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0811, Japan. sawaki@edu.hokudai.ac.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The P300 event-related brain potential (ERP) was elicited using a visual three-stimulus oddball paradigm (standard 0.70, target 0.15, non-target 0.15) to examine how target/standard stimulus context affects non-target processing. METHODS: Target/standard discrimination difficulty (easy or difficult) and non-target /target similarity (similar or dissimilar) were manipulated orthogonally. Participants (N=13) were instructed to respond to each infrequent target stimulus by pressing a button. RESULTS: Target stimuli in all task conditions elicited P3b, which was affected only by the difficulty of target/standard discrimination. When target/standard discrimination was easy, the amplitude of non-target P3 was larger for similar than for dissimilar non-target. In contrast, when target/standard discrimination was difficult, non-target stimuli elicited P3a, the amplitude of which was larger for dissimilar than for similar non-target. Thus, the P300 component for non-target stimuli and the pattern of the effect of target similarity on each P300 component varied as a function of the target/standard stimulus context. CONCLUSIONS: The target/standard stimulus context influences the attentional set for stimulus processing such that it determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. SIGNIFICANCE: The present results are important for understanding the mechanism of cognitive modification in non-target processing.
OBJECTIVE: The P300 event-related brain potential (ERP) was elicited using a visual three-stimulus oddball paradigm (standard 0.70, target 0.15, non-target 0.15) to examine how target/standard stimulus context affects non-target processing. METHODS: Target/standard discrimination difficulty (easy or difficult) and non-target /target similarity (similar or dissimilar) were manipulated orthogonally. Participants (N=13) were instructed to respond to each infrequent target stimulus by pressing a button. RESULTS: Target stimuli in all task conditions elicited P3b, which was affected only by the difficulty of target/standard discrimination. When target/standard discrimination was easy, the amplitude of non-target P3 was larger for similar than for dissimilar non-target. In contrast, when target/standard discrimination was difficult, non-target stimuli elicited P3a, the amplitude of which was larger for dissimilar than for similar non-target. Thus, the P300 component for non-target stimuli and the pattern of the effect of target similarity on each P300 component varied as a function of the target/standard stimulus context. CONCLUSIONS: The target/standard stimulus context influences the attentional set for stimulus processing such that it determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. SIGNIFICANCE: The present results are important for understanding the mechanism of cognitive modification in non-target processing.
Authors: Noa Fogelson; Xue Wang; Jeffrey B Lewis; Mark M Kishiyama; Mingzhou Ding; Robert T Knight Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Brittany R Alperin; Anna E Haring; Tatyana Y Zhuravleva; Phillip J Holcomb; Dorene M Rentz; Kirk R Daffner Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 3.225