Literature DB >> 25848684

Rapid Context-based Identification of Target Sounds in an Auditory Scene.

Marissa L Gamble1, Marty G Woldorff1.   

Abstract

To make sense of our dynamic and complex auditory environment, we must be able to parse the sensory input into usable parts and pick out relevant sounds from all the potentially distracting auditory information. Although it is unclear exactly how we accomplish this difficult task, Gamble and Woldorff [Gamble, M. L., & Woldorff, M. G. The temporal cascade of neural processes underlying target detection and attentional processing during auditory search. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 2014] recently reported an ERP study of an auditory target-search task in a temporally and spatially distributed, rapidly presented, auditory scene. They reported an early, differential, bilateral activation (beginning at 60 msec) between feature-deviating target stimuli and physically equivalent feature-deviating nontargets, reflecting a rapid target detection process. This was followed shortly later (at 130 msec) by the lateralized N2ac ERP activation, that reflects the focusing of auditory spatial attention toward the target sound and parallels the attentional-shifting processes widely studied in vision. Here we directly examined the early, bilateral, target-selective effect to better understand its nature and functional role. Participants listened to midline-presented sounds that included target and nontarget stimuli that were randomly either embedded in a brief rapid stream or presented alone. The results indicate that this early bilateral effect results from a template for the target that utilizes its feature deviancy within a stream to enable rapid identification. Moreover, individual-differences analysis showed that the size of this effect was larger for participants with faster RTs. The findings support the hypothesis that our auditory attentional systems can implement and utilize a context-based relational template for a target sound, making use of additional auditory information in the environment when needing to rapidly detect a relevant sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25848684      PMCID: PMC4522206          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

1.  Mechanisms for allocating auditory attention: an auditory saliency map.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Christopher I Petkov; Michael Lippert; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Jun'ichi Katayama
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  The role of spatial location in auditory search.

Authors:  Ranmalee Eramudugolla; Ken I McAnally; Russell L Martin; Dexter R F Irvine; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Overriding auditory attentional capture.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

5.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm.

Authors:  J Katayama; J Polich
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11

7.  Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction.

Authors:  M G Woldorff
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?

Authors:  N Wood; N Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields.

Authors:  Alexander Degerman; Teemu Rinne; Anna-Kaisa Särkkä; Juha Salmi; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.